Keywords: admissibility of application; Convention for the Protection of Human Rights; European Court of Human Rights; Fabian v. Hungary; interference of rights
This text presents the Russian translation of the ECHR Judgement of 15 December 2015 on the above mentioned case lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms by a Hungarian national, Mr Gyula Fábián, on 5 December 2013. The applicant complained under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 and Article 14 of the Convention that the suspension of disbursement of his pension for the duration of his post‑retirement employment amounted to an unjustified and discriminatory interference with his property rights. The Court has declared the application admissible. After the hearings in this case the Court ruled that that there has been a violation of Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 1 of Protocol No. 1. In the final part of its Judgement the Court has held that the respondent State (Hungary) is to pay the applicant, within three months an amount totalling EUR 18 thousand. Also the Court has dismissed the remainder of the applicant’s claim for just satisfaction.
The original text of Judgement is available at: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-159210.