Regulation of private international law and international civil procedure in Argentina (general characteristic and procedural aspect)

Available in Russian

FREE
Send a request via mail

Authors: Irina Getman-Pavlova, Natalia Erpyleva

DOI: 10.21128/2226-2059-2019-1-134-147

Keywords: Argentina; choice-of-law (conflict) rules; Civil Code; codification; Commercial Code; International Civil Procedure; international jurisdiction; intra-branch complex form; Private International Law

Abstract

The article is devoted to the research of a new regulation in Private International Law and International Civil Procedure in Argentina which was introduced in the process of recodification of private law. In 2014 a new Civil and Commercial Code of Argentina was adopted in which the Title “Provisions on Private International Law” (articles 2594–2671) establishes choice-of-law (conflict) rules and jurisdictional rules. For the purpose of codification of Private International Law and International Civil Procedure the Argentinean legislator chose intra-branch complex form of codification which is traditional for that country. In the article much attention is paid to the analysis of procedural aspects of legislation adopted. The new regulation is internationally oriented and broadens of judicial discretion in order to take into account the concrete circumstances of a case, the majority of International Civil Procedure rules is directed for the protection of access to the efficient justice. Unfortunately, the Argentinean legislator refused to apply the autonomous complex form of codification of Private International Law and International Civil Procedure, so the new regulation became incomplete, particularly the rules of recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments were not included. Despite the range of shortcomings, the new Private International Law and International Civil Procedure of Argentina have serious advantages: a) closed list of foundations of exclusive jurisdiction of local courts is established; b) recognition of parties’ autonomy of will in choice of court is introduced; c) principle of controlled plurality of proceedings is formulated.

About the authors: Natalia Erpyleva – Doctor of Sciences in Law, Professor, Head of the Department of General and Interbranch Legal Disciplines, Faculty of Law, Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia; Irina Getman-Pavlova – Candidate of Sciences (Ph.D.) in Law, Associate Professor, Department of General and Interbranch Legal Disciplines, Faculty of Law, Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia.

Citation: Erpyleva N., Getman-Pavlova I. (2019) Regulirovanie mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava i mezhdunarodnogo grazhdanskogo protsessa v Argentine (obshchaya kharakteristika i protsessual'nyy aspekt) [Regulation of private international law and international civil procedure in Argentina (general characteristic and procedural aspect)]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol.9, no.1, pp.134–147. (In Russian).

References

Artemieva Yu.A., Ermakova E.P., Kovyrshina N.A., Rusakova E.P. (2017) Sposoby razresheniya sporov v raznosistemnykh pravoporyadkakh [Methods of resolving disputes in diverse systems of legal orders], Moscow: Infotropic Media. (In Russian).

Belikova K.M. (2010) Pravovoe regulirovanie torgovogo oborota i kodifikatsiya chastnogo prava v stranakh Latinskoy Ameriki [Legal regulation of commercial turnover and the codification of private law in Latin American countries], Moscow: Yustitsinform. (In Russian).

Bisello G., Cognetti C., Lo Gerfo F. (2015) Deactivating the Italian Torpedo // Themis 2015: Semi-Final C: International Judicial Cooperation in Civil Matters – European Civil procedure. P.5. Available at: http://www.ejtn.eu/Documents/Themis%20Luxembourg/Written_paper_Italy3.pdf (accessed: 05.05.2018).

Fernández-Arroyo D.P. (2005) What’s new in Latin American Private International Law? Yearbook of Private International Law, vol.7, pp.85–117.

Fernández-Arroyo D.P. (2017) Main Characteristics of the New Private International Law of the Argentinian Republic. RabelsZ, vol.80, no.1, pp.130–150.

Fernández-Arroyo D.P., Paula María All P.M. (2014) Proof of and Information about Foreign Law. In: Reports of the Argentine Association of Comparative Law to the XIX Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law, part I, pp.103–132.

Giménez Corte C. (2016) Autonomía de la voluntad, prácticas, usos y costumbres, y el régimen de los contratos internacionales. De los antiguos Código de Comercio y Código Civil al nuevo Código Civil y Comercial argentino [Autonomy of will, practices, usages, and customs, and the regime of international contracts. From the former Commercial Code and Civil Code to the new Civil and Commercial Code of Argentina]. Thomson Reuters Información Legal. May 2016. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305636901 (accessed: 15.05.2018). (In Spanish).

Maekelt T.B. (1982) General rules of private international law in the Americas: new approach. In: Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law, Leiden; Boston, MA: Brill/Nijhoff, vol.177, pp.239–306.

Marotta J., Parise A. (2014) Argentina – On Codes, Marriage, and Access to Justice: Recent Developments in the Law of Argentina. Journal of Civil Law Studies, vol.7,no.1, pp.237–269.

Medina G. (2014) Argentina on the Eve of a New Civil and Commercial Code. In: Rivera J.C. (ed.). The Scope and Structure of Civil Codes, Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media, pp.43–66.

Medvedev S.N. (2016) Novy Grazhdansky i kommercheskiy kodeks Argentiny [The new Civil and commercial code of Argentina]. Severo-Kavkaz­skiy yuridicheskiy vestnik, no.1, pp.37–41. (In Russian).

Muranov A.I., Zhil'tsov A.N. (2001) Natsionalnye kodifikatsii v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave: Tendentsii i protivorchiya v ego razvitii na poroge tret'ego tysyacheletiya [National codifications in modern private international law: Trends and contradictions in its development on the threshold of the third millennium]. In: Muranov A.I., Zhil'tsov A.N. (eds.). Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo: Inostrannoe zakonodatel'stvo [Private international law: foreign legislation], Moscow: Statut. (In Russian).

Najurieta M.S., Noodt Taquela M.B. (2010) Private International Law: Recent Private International Law Codifications. In: Informes de la Asociación Argentina de Derecho Comparado al XVIII Congreso de la Academia Internacional de Derecho Comparado. Symeon C. Symeonides, General Reporter, Buenos Aires: Asociación Argentina de Derecho Comparado, pp.219–266. Available at: http://www.derechocomparado.org.ar/documentos (accessed: 25.02.2019). (In Spanish).

Parise A. (2011) Legal Transplants and Codification: Exploring the North American Sources of the Civil Code of Argentina (1871). Isaidat Law Review, vol.1, no.2, pp.1–64.

Parise A. (2017) The Argentine Civil and Commercial Code (2015): Igniting a Third Generation of Codes for Latin America. Zeitschrift fur Europaisches Privatrecht, no.3, pp.639–668.

Rafalyuk E.E. (2010) Unifikatsiya mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava v stranakh Latinskoy Ameriki: istoriya i sovremennost' [Unification of private international law in Latin American countries: History and modernity]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, no.5, pp.88–98. (In Russian).

Shak H. (2001) Mezhdunarodnoe grazhdanskoe protsessual'noe pravo [International civil procedure law], Moscow: BEK. (In Russian).

Szászy I. (1966) The Basic Connecting Factor in International Cases in the Domain of Civil Procedure. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol.15, no.2, pp.436–456.

Żytkiewicz N. (2017) Kodyfikacja prawa prywatnego międzynarodowego w Argentynie [Codification of private international law in Argentina]. Kwartalnik Prawa Prywatnego, vol.26. no.2, pp.297–335. (In Polish).