Available in Russian
Authors: Kanstantsin Dzehtsiarou, Noreen O’Meara
Keywords: advisory opinions; European Convention on Human Rights; European Court of Human Rights; legitimacy; Protocol No. 16 to the Convention; reforms
Protocol 16 ECHR will provide for an extension of the advisory jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), enabling highest national courts to request advisory opinions on questions of principle concerning the interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) or its Protocols. This extension of the ECtHR’s advisory jurisdiction aims to achieve two goals: a reduction in the ECtHR’s excessive docket, and the enhancement of dialogue between the ECtHR and (highest) national courts. While the aims of this reform initiative are laudable, we argue that Protocol 16 is likely to fail to achieve its objectives.