The comparative study of functioning of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union

Available in Russian

Author: Kembaev Zhenis

DOI: 10.21128/2226-2059-2016-2-30-45


This article examines legal aspects of functioning of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU Court) in the course of comparative analysis of its main legal features with the same characteristics of other supranational judicial bodies – such as, for example, Economic Court of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS EC); the already non-existent Court of the Eurasian Economic Community (EurAsEC Court, 2012 to 2014) and the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ). Concluding the article, the author notes that the EAEU Court has a number of advantages over the CIS EC: for example, the EAEU Court is empowered to take binding decisions, while applications to the Court may submit not only member states but also economic and business entities. However, at the same time, in many respects, EAEU Court appears much weaker institution compared to the EurAsEC Court: in particular, the judges of the EAEU Court are heavily dependent on the public authorities of the Union (e.g. the High Council) and on the member states authorities. The Court also is not endowed with the power to determine the order and procedure of decision enforcement and to indicate provisional measures. Pointing out a significant setback in building an effectual judicial authority within the Eurasian integration, with EAEU Court having in this respect no similarities with ECJ, the author says that the EAEU itself has an extremely unstable structure which has no solid legal basis. Only the concerted, competent, both politically and legally consistent and relevant actions of the Court and the EAEU Commission could contribute to the progressive development of the Eurasian law and gradual consolidation of the Eurasian integration.

About the author: Zhenis Kembayev – Dr. jur. (University of Cologne), Professor at the University KIMEP, Almaty, Kazakhstan.

Citation: Kembayev Zh. (2016) Sravnitel'no-pravovoy analiz funktsinirovaniya Suda Evraziyskogo Ekonomicheskogo Soyuza [The comparative study of functioning of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, no.2, pp.30–45. (In Russian).


Danilenko G.M. (1999) The Economic Court of the Commonwealth of Independent States. New York University Journal of International Law & Politics, no.4, pp.893–918.

Ispolinov A.S. (2013) First Judgments of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Community: Reviewing Private Rights in a New Regional Agreement. Legal Issues of Economic Integration, no.3, pp.225–246.

Ispolinov A.S. (2013) Reshenie Bol’shoy kollegii Suda EurAsEC po delu Yuzhnogo Kuzbassa: naskol'ko obosnovan sudeyskiy aktivizm? [The decision of the Grand Chamber of the EurAsES Court on South Kuzbass case: in what degree is judicial activism justified?]. Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal, no.5, pp.19–26.

Ispolinov A.S. (2013) Pervye resheniya Suda EurAsEC: teoreticheskie i prakticheskie voprosy yurisdiktsii [The first decisions of the EurAsEC Court: theoretical and practical issues of jurisdiction]. Rossiyskoe pravosudie, no.6, pp.89–101.

Ispolinov A.S. (2013) Navyazannyy monolog: pervoe preyuditsial'noe zaklyu­chenie Suda EurAsEC [A compelled monologue: the first prejudicial decision of the EurAsEC Court]. Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal, no.8, pp.21–30.

Ispolinov A.S. (2015) Evraziyskoe pravosudie: ot Suda Soobshchestva k Sudu Soyuza [The Eurasian justice: from the Community Court to the Union Court]. Gosudarstvo i pravo, no.1, pp.80–88.

Kembaev Zh.M. (2007) Pravovye aspekty ekonomicheskoy integratsii na postsovetskom prostranstve: problemy i perspektivy razvitiya [Legal aspects of the economic integration on the post-Soviet space: developmental problems and development prospects]. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Pravovedenie, no.3, pp.146–155.

Kembaev Zh.M. (2008) Evraziyskoe ekonomicheskoe soobshchestvo: pravovye osnovy deyatel’nosti i perspektivy razvitiya [Eurasian Economic Community: the legal foundations of functioning and development perspectives]. Gosudarstvo i Pravo, no.10, pp.53–59.

Kembaev Zh.M. (2008) Lissabonskiy dogovor: novyy etap v razvitii Evropey­skoy integratsii [The Lisbon Treaty: a new stage in the development of European integration]. Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava, no.4, pp.180–194.

Kembaev Zh.M. (2010) Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' gosudarstv-chlenov Evropeyskogo Soyuza za narushenie norm Evropeyskogo prava [Legal responsibility of the EU member states for violations of the European law norms]. Sovremennoe pravo, no.8, pp.123–126.

Kembaev Zh.M. (2011) O pravovykh voprosakh integratsionnykh protsessov na Evraziyskom prostranstve [On legal issues in the integration process within the Eurasian area]. Sovremennoe pravo, no.9, pp.88–94.

Kembaev Zh.M. (2016) Regional'naya integratsiya v Evrazii: osnovnye pri­znaki, problemy i perspektivy [Regional integration in Eurasia: principal features, issues and prospects]. Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal, no.2.

Neshataeva T.N., Myslivskiy P.P. (2013) Pervy god sushchestvovaniya Suda Evraziyskogo Ekonomicheskogo Soobshchestva: itogi i perspektivy [Jurisprudence from the first year of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Community: perspectives and results]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, no.2, pp.88–100.

Neshataeva T.N. (2013) Vybor puti Suda EurAsEC: pravovye pozitsii i zashchita prav [The EurAsEC Court on the crossroads: legal views and rights protection]. Zakon, no.9, pp.82–94.

Neshataeva T.N. (2014) Integratsiya i nadnatsionalizm [Integration and supranationalism]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki, no.2, pp.243–248.

Neshataeva T.N. (2015) Yedinoobraznoe pravoprimenenie – tsel' Suda Evraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza [Uniform law enforcement as a purpose of the Eurasian Economic Union Court]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, no.2, pp.115–125.