Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union on the powers of the European Securities and Markets Authority

Настоящий материал (информация) произведён, распространён иностранным агентом Автономная некоммерческая организация «Институт права и публичной политики» либо касается деятельности иностранного агента Автономная некоммерческая организация «Институт права и публичной политики»

Available in Russian

Author: Rustam Kasyanov

DOI: 10.21128/2226-2059-2017-2-17-27

Keywords: Eurasian Economic Union; European Court of Justice; European financial and stock markets; European financial markets; European Union; regulation of securities markets


Three years ago, the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) delivered a judgment in the case of UK v. Parliament and Council. This judgment allows for a better understanding of the recent developments in security markets of the European Union and in the legal regulation of these processes. This case broadens the legal discourse in the EU and provides solid ground to reflect on these trends. Explaining the ECJ’s position, the author shows the systemic character of the European Union’s approach to market regulation. The EU solves problems holistically and simultaneously shows a high degree of adaptability to new conditions. This commentary reveals the main trends in the legal regulation of financial markets in the EU. Some other theoretical issues relate to the growing role of European agencies, such as the European Securities and Markets Authority. A second and more particular reason for the author’s concern with this judgment is the practical significance it may have for Russia’s activities within the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and the EAEU Court’s jurisdiction. The Eurasian Court could draw upon the world’s best legal practices, including the judicial experience of the ECJ, owing to the fact that the European Union is now justly considered to be a supranational commonwealth that has achieved significant results, despite some negative trends and new challenges. Lastly, the knowledge and skills of several generations of ECJ judges provide a good example of judicial work.

About the author: Rustam Kasyanov – Candidate of Sciences (Ph.D.) in Law, Ph.D. in EU Law (France), Associate Professor, Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University), Moscow, Russia.

Citation: Kasyanov R. (2017) Sud Evropeyskogo Soyuza podtverdil polnomochiya Evropeyskogo organa po tsennym bumagam i rynkam: Kommentariy k resheniyu Suda Evropeiskogo Soyuza No.С-270/12 ot 22 yanvarya 2014 goda po delu Soedinyonnoe Korolevstvo Velikobritanii i Severnoy Irlandii protiv Evropeyskogo parlamenta i Soveta Evropeyskogo Soyuza [Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union on the powers of the European Securities and Markets Authority: A commentary on the judgment of European Court of Justice C-270/12 of 22 January 2014 in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v. European Parliament and Council of the European Union]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, no.2, pp.17–27. (In Russian).


Conac P.-H., Caillat V. (2010) Du CESR à l’ESMA: le Rubicon est franchi. Bulletin Joly Bourse, 1 novembre, n°6, p.500.

Jairath A. (2005) The impact of the Market in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID). Journal of Investment Compliance, vol.6, no.3, pp.50–51.

Kasyanov R.A. (2013) Evropeyskiy opyt pravovogo regulirovaniya finan­sovykh rynkov i vozmozhnosti ego primeneniya v Rossii [European Experience of Financial Market Regulation and Opportunities for its Application in Russia]. Vestnik MGIMO, no.4, рр.267–274. (In Russian).

Lannoo K., Levin M. (2004) Securities Market Regulation in the EU: Everything You Always Wanted to Know about the Lamfalussy Procedure: CEPS Research Reports in Finance and Banking No.33, Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies.

Levi-Faur D. (2010) Regulatory Networks and Regulatory Agencification: Toward a Single European Regulatory Space. Jerusalem Papers in Regulation & Governance, Working Paper no.30, pp.1–47.

Lo Schiavo G. (2015) A Judicial Re-Thinking on the Delegation of Powers to European Agencies under EU Law? Comment on Case C-270/12 UK v. Council and Parliament. German Law Journal, vol.16, no.2, pp.315–335.

Neshataeva T. (2016) O problemakh v deystvii recheniy organov EAES v natsional'nykh pravoporyadkakh gosudarstv-chlenov [On the ambiguous effects of the EAEU bodies’ decisions within the national legal systems of member states] // Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, no.3, pp.10– 17. (In Russian).

Partsch Ph.-E. (2016) Droit bancaire et financier européen. T.1: Cadre général – Les établissements de crédit, 2e éd., Bruxelles: Larcier.

Pelkmans J., Simoncini M. (2014) Mellowing Meroni: How ESMA can help build the single market. CEPS Commentaries, 18 February. Available at: https://www.ceps.eu/publications/mellowing-meroni-how-esma-can-help-build-single-market (accessed: 01.03.2017).

Sousi B. (2002) L’approche Lamfalussy, une méthode douce pour “détricoter” l’harmonisation financière européenne? Recueil Dalloz (Cahier droit des affaires), no.178, pp.3322–3323.