Available only in Russian
Author: Iliya Shablinsky
Keywords: blocking of Internet resources, control over electronic correspondence, hyperlinks, information rights, information technologies
This article examines and summarises judicial practice in cases related to the use of new information technologies. The study primarily focuses upon the decisions of Russian courts (general jurisdiction and arbitration) and the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). Employing ECHR practice, the author also refers to numerous decisions by courts in Hungary and the United Kingdom. Cases related to the use of new information technologies can be distinguished between, and this article examines the judicial practice of three categories of cases: 1) blocking of internet resources; 2) employers’ control over employees’ electronic correspondence; 3) journalists’ use of hyperlinks in author’s texts and their responsibility of such placements. Within each category of cases, the rights of citizens can be seriously violated. The article highlights that in an era of rapid development of new information technologies, states, represented by special services and authorised state bodies, are making unprecedented efforts to ensure that they maintain at least partial control over the activities of new actors (bloggers, Internet media, Internet platforms, etc.). Similarly, courts often compromise with authorities when resolving such issues. Notably, national Russian courts did not consider parties’ interests, nor did they assess the need to block all sites with a particular IP address. They did not even follow the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation’s decision to apply the requirements of the European Convention on Human Rights within the framework of the ECHR. The courts limited themselves to pointing out that Roskomnadzor acted within its power. Thus, the decisions of the national courts did not offer a mechanism for protecting rights. Within the norms regulating the new sphere of relations, there are often norms of a restrictive and prohibitive nature, and these norms are dominant in the Russian Federation. In this regard, there remains grounds for concern among lawyers involved in the protection of rights related to new information technologies.
About the author: Ilya Shablinsky – Doctor of Sciences in Law, Professor of Constitutional and Administrative Law, Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia
Citation: Shablinsky I. (2021) Svoboda vyrazheniya mneniy i uvazhenie chastnoy zhizni v kontekste razvitiya novykh informatsionnykh tekhnologiy: sudebnaya praktika ESPCH i natsional'nykh sudov [Freedom of expression and respect for private life in the context of the development of new information technologies: judicial practice of the ECHR and national courts]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol.11, no.3, pp.141–156. (In Russian).
Denisova A. (2020) Deyatel'nost' zhurnalista v tsifrovuyu epokhu: postanovlenie Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka po delu “Mad’yar Yeti” protiv Vengrii ot 4 dekabrya 2018 goda (zhaloba no.11257/16) [Journalist’s activities in the digital age: judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Magyar Yeti v. Hungary of 4 December 2018 (application no.11257/16)]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol.10, no.2, pp.18–26. (In Russian).
Dupan (Gutnikova) A.S. (ed.) (2016) Novaya paradigma zashchity i upravleniya personal'nymi dannymi: monografiya [A new paradigm of personal data protection and management: a monograph], Moscow: Izdatel'skiy dom Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki. (In Russian).
Efremov A.A. (2016) Novye informatsionnye tekhnologii v praktike Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka [New information technologies in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights]. Pretsedenty Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka, no.6, pp.10–15. (In Russian).
Lovtsov D.A., Niesov V.A. (2013) Aktual'nye problemy sozdaniya i razvitiya edinogo informatsionnogo prostranstva sudebnoy sistemy Rossii [Current problems of creation and development of a single information space of the judicial system of Russia]. Informatsionnoe pravo, no.5, pp.13–18. (In Russian).
Pastukhov P.S. (2016) Pravovye aspekty ispol'zovaniya informatsionnykh tekhnologiy dlya obespecheniya obshchestvennoy bezopasnosti i obshchestvennogo poryadka [Legal aspects of the use of information technologies for public safety and public order]. Vestnik Prikamskogo sotsial'nogo instituta, no.3, pp.6–12. (In Russian).
Soboleva A.K. (2016) “Avtoritet i bespristrastnost' sudebnoy vlasti” v tolkovanii Evropeyskogo Suda: SMI i interesy pravosudiya [“The authority and impartiality of the judiciary” in the interpretation of the European Court of Justice: the media and the interests of justice]. Pretsedentnaya praktika Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka, no.4, pp.3–18. (In Russian).
Soboleva A.K. (2017) Svoboda vyrazheniya mneniya v praktike Evropeyskogo Suda: starye podkhody i novye tendentsii v tolkovanii stat'i 10 EKPCh [Freedom of expression in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights: old approaches and new tendencies in interpretation of Article 10 of ECHR]. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Yuridicheskie nauki, no.2, pp.235–262. (In Russian).
Todd D. (2013) Tsifrovoe piratstvo: Kak piratstvo menyaet biznes, obshchestvo i kul'turu [Pirate nation. How digital piracy is transforming business, society and culture], L.Plostak, U.Saptsina (transl.), Moscow: Al'pina Biznes Buks. (In Russian).
Vasilenko V.I., Vasilenko V.V., Mamedov R.N., Poteenko A.G. (2015) Massmedia v usloviyakh globalizatsii: Informatsionno-kommunikatsionnaya bezopasnost': monografiya [Mass media in the context of globalization. Information and communication security: a monograph], V.I.Vasilenko (ed.), Moscow: Prospekt. (In Russian).
Vavulin D.A. (2012) Raskrytie informatsii aktsionernymi obshchestvami [Information disclosure by joint-stock companies], Moscow: Yustitsinform. (In Russian).
Zharova A.K. (2016) Pravo i informatsionnye konflikty v informatsionno-telekommunikatsionnoy sfere [Law and information conflicts in the information and telecommunications sphere], Moscow: Yanus-K. (In Russian).