International space law of the era of the beginning of the business colonization of space

Available in Russian

Author: Aleksei Ispolinov

DOI: 10.21128/2226-2059-2020-4-22-44

Keywords: national space laws; outer space resources; space; the Artemis Accords; the Outer Space Treaty


Traditional approach to the activity in outer space as exclusive domain of few big space faring states through special governmental agencies as a sort of natural monopolies is rapidly placing by the prevailing view that such activity could be successfully and efficiently performed by private entities and fair competition between such players shall be allowed and is even desirable. Increasing participation of private capital in exploration of the resources of outer space is a persuasive confirmation of the emerging large-scale, self-sufficient economy of the New Space attractive for potential investors. Such economy requires sufficient level of legal certainty in a form of effective legal rules adequately reflecting contemporary reality and capable to guarantee the rights of commercial players in exploration of space resources including ownership rights on space resources obtained. Arguably, such reshaping of international space law will take place outside the UN and would not be based on the concept of space as a common heritage of mankind. Main drivers of this reshaping will be unilateral national laws like the U.S. Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act or Luxembourg Space, bilateral agreements or international treaties with small number of participants (like the International Space Station Agreement or the Artemis Accords). Such national practice and international treaties claiming that they are adopted in implementation and in full conformity with the Outer Space Treaty will be viewed as subsequent practice and subsequent agreements clarifying, amending and even modifying rather vague provisions of the Outer Space Treaty. The values of the Outer Space Treaty will increase due to a lack of strict rules regulating or prohibiting commercial exploitation of space resources. It will allow to perform evolutionary reform of international space law using new avenues of the treaty creating new rules which will implement and improve provisions of the Outer Space Treaty.

About the author: Alexey Ispolinov – Doctor of Sciences in Law, Senior Partner at “Lex-Invest” Law Firm, Moscow, Russia.

Citation: Ispolinov A. (2020) Mezhdunarodnoe kosmicheskoe pravo epokhi nachala biznes-kolonizatsii kosmosa [International space law of the era of the beginning of the business colonization of space]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol.10, no.4, pp.22–44. (In Russian).


Arbaugh C. (2014) Gravitating Toward Sensible Resolutions: The PCA Optional Rules for the Arbitration of Disputes Relating to Outer Space Activity. Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, vol.42, no.3, pp.825–850.

Berkman P.A., Vylegzhanin A.N., Yuzbashyan M.R., Mauduit J.-Ch. (2018) Mezhdunarodnoe kosmicheskoe pravo: obshchie dlya Rossii i SShA vyzovy i perspektivy [Outer space law: Russia – United States common challenges and perspectives]. Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava, no.1, pp.16–34. (In Russian).

Blount P.J., Robinson Ch.J. (2016) One Small Step: The Impact of the U.S. Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act of 2015 on the Exploration of Resources in Outer Space. North Carolina Journal of Law and Technology, vol.18, no.2, pp.160–186.

Brittinham B. (2010) Does the World Really Need New Space Law? Oregon Review of International Law, vol.12, no.1, pp.31–54.

Clancy E. (1998) The Tragedy of the Global Commons. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, vol.5, no.2, pp.601–619.

Coffey S. (2009) Establishing a Legal Framework for Property Rights to Natural Resources in Outer Space. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, vol.119, no.1, pp.119–147.

DiMaria S. (2016) Starships and Enterprise: Private Spaceflight Companies’ Property Rights and the U.S. Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act. St. John’s Law Review, vol.90, no.2, pp.415–440.

Helfer L. (2004) Regime Shifting: The TRIPs Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking. Yale Journal of International Law, vol.29, no.2, pp.1–83.

John A. (2006) The Recent Boom in Private Space Development and the Necessity of an International Framework Embracing Private Property Rights to Encourage Investment. International Lawyer, vol.40, no.4, pp.961–985.

Johnson D. (2011) Limits on the Giant Leap for Mankind: Legal Ambiguities of Extraterrestrial Resource Extraction. American University International Law Review, vol.26, no.5, pp.1477–1517.

Leon M. (2018) Mining for Meaning: An Examination of the Legality of Property Rights in Space Resources. Virginia Law Review, vol.104, no.3, pp.497–546.

MacWhorter K. (2016) Sustainable Mining: Incentivizing Asteroid Mining in the Name of Environmentalism. William and Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review, vol.40, no.2, pp.654–676.

Manzione L. (2002) Multinational Investment in the Space Station: An Outer Space Model for International Cooperation? American University International Law Review, vol.18, no.2, pp.507–535.

Mitchell R. (2018) Into the Final Frontier: The Expanse of Space Commercialization. Missouri Law Review, vol.83, no.2, pp.419–454.

Nelson T. (2011) The Moon Agreement and Private Enterprise: Lessons from Investment Law. ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law, vol.17, no.2, pp.393–416.

Reinstein E. (1999) Owning Outer Space. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, vol.20, no.1, pp.59–98.

Shtodina I.Yu. (2018). Nekotorye aktual'nye voprosy pravovogo obespecheniya issledovaniya i ispol'­zovaniya kosmosa [Some actual issues of the legal enforcement of the exploration and use of outer space]. Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava, no.2, pp.71–81. (In Russian).

Spectar J.M. (2000) Elephants, Donkeys, or Other Creatures? Presidential Election Cycles & International Law of the Global Commons. American University International Law Review, vol.15, no.5, pp.975–1038.

Tronchetti F. (2008) The Non-Appropriation Principle as a Structural Norm of International Law: A New Way of Interpreting Article II of the Outer Space Treaty. Air and Space Law, vol.33, no.3, pp.277–305.

Tronchetti F. (2009) The Exploitation of Natural Resources of the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies: A Proposal for a Legal Regime, Leiden; Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff.

Tunkin G. (1993) Is General International Law Customary Law Only? European Journal of International Law, vol.4, no.1, pp.534–541.

Volynskaya O.A. (2017) Yubiley dogovora po kosmosu 1967 goda [Anniversary of the 1967 Outer Space Treaty]. Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava, no.4, pp.82–95. (In Russian).

Vylegzhanin A.N. (ed.) (2007) Mezhdunarodno-pravovye osnovy nedropol'zovaniya [International legal framework for subsoil use], Moscow: Norma. (In Russian).

Weinzierl M. (2018) Space, the Final Economic Frontier. Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol.32, no.2, pp.173–192.

Wilson J. (2011) Regulation of the Outer Space Environment through International Accord: The 1979 Moon Treaty. Fordham Environmental Law Review, vol.2, no.2, pp.173–193.

Works J. (1980) The Moon Treaty. Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, vol.9, no.2, pp.281–285.

Wrench J. (2019) Non-Appropriation, No Problem: The Outer Space Treaty Is Ready for Asteroid Mining Case. Western Reserve Journal of International Law, vol.51, no.1, pp.437–462.

Yuzbashyan M.R. (2017) Zakon SShA ob issledovanii i ispol'zovanii kosmicheskikh resursov 2015 g. i mezhdunarodnoe kosmicheskoe parvo [The US Space Resource Exploration and Utilization Act of 2015 and the international space law]. Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava, vol.106, no.2, pp.71–86. (In Russian).

Zell J. (2006) Putting a Mine on the Moon: Creating an International Authority to Regulate Mining Rights in Outer Space. Minnesota Journal of International Law, vol.15, no.2, pp.486–518.

Zhukov G., Kolosov Yu. (eds.) (2014) International Space Law, B.Belitzky (transl.), 2nd ed., Moscow: Statut.