The impact of sanctions on the resolution of international business disputes: maintaining the status quo or looking for alternative jurisdictions?

---

The negative impact of the economic sanctions is not limited to the sphere of substantive law; it also extends to issues related to dispute resolution. Trying to achieve a fair resolution of disputes sanctioned persons may face many obstacles literally at every stage of the proceedings, starting with problems related to payment of arbitration fees, searching for counsels and arbitrators who are often reluctant to taking corresponding sanctions risks, and ending with the stage of enforcement of a judgment or an arbitral award. Under these conditions, the conduct of court or arbitration proceedings, if theoretically possible, in practice will be associated with substantial organizational difficulties, delays in consideration of a case and significant additional costs. In this regard the authors, based on the foreign and Russian experience, analyze advantages and disadvantages of various options for resolving the disputes involving sanctioned persons, including maintaining the former procedure for resolving disputes, transferring disputes to a neutral or domestic jurisdictions, as well as the latest legislative amendments, namely provisions of the Russian Arbitrazh Procedure Code expanding the exclusive jurisdiction of Russian arbitrazh (commercial) courts which have entered into force in June 2020. Maintaining the status quo between parties to a dispute provides a high degree of legal certainty but does not take into account the potentially serious breach of sanctioned persons’ rights. While the transfer of dispute resolution to the domestic jurisdiction allows the latter to ensure the protection of their rights, but, in turn, carries the risks of violating the existing balance in relations between the parties, refusal to recognize and enforce a future judgement in foreign jurisdictions and etc. Given the impossibility to foresee in advance the extension of restrictive measures to parties of a contract and character of such measures, perhaps the optimal solution could be the so-called cascade arbitration clauses, providing for variability of actions in certain cases, in particular: 1) choice of alternative forum; 2) establishing additional requirements for the neutrality of arbitrators; 3) waiver of the parties to submit disputes to jurisdictions that cannot provide equal and impartial resolution of the dispute in new circumstances. In addition, the parties are strongly encouraged to carefully consider the choice of law provisions, including choice of law applicable to the arbitration agreement.

About the authors: Vladislav Starzhenetskiy – Candidate of Sciences (Ph.D.) in Law, Associate Professor, Faculty of Law, Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia; Saglar Ochirova – Master of Laws (Higher School of Economics), Attorney at Dispute Resolution Practice of ALRUD Law Firm, Moscow, Russia.

Citation: Starzhenetskiy V., Ochirova S. (2020) Vliyanie sanktsiy na razreshenie vneshneekonomicheskikh sporov: sokhranenie status quo ili poisk al'ternativnykh yurisdiktsiy? [The impact of sanctions on the resolution of international business disputes: maintaining the status quo or looking for alternative jurisdictions?]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol.10, no.4, pp.144–167. (In Russian).

References

Born G.B. (2020) Mezhdunarodnyy arbitrazh: pravo i praktika [International arbitration: law and practice], N.A.Babadzhanyan (transl.), Moscow: Rossiyskiy arbitrazhnyy tsentr. (In Russian).

Chuprunov I.S. (2013) Arbitrabel'nost': primenimoe pravo i vliyanie so storony sverkhimperativnykh norm [Arbitrability: arbitrability: governing law and impact of overriding mandatory rules]. In: Asoskov A.V., Vilkova N.G., Khodykin R.M. (eds.) Novye gorizonty mezhdunarodnogo arbitrazha: sbornik statey [New horizons of international arbitration: a collection of essays], vol.1, Moscow: Infotropik Media, pp.297–362. (In Russian).

De Brabandere E., Holloway D. (2017) Sanctions and International Arbitration. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2847000 (accessed: 18.11.2020).

Doraev M.G. (2016) Ekonomicheskie sanktsii v prave SShA, Evropeyskogo soyuza i Rossii [Economic sanctions in the law of the US, the EU and Russia], Moscow: Infotropik Media. (In Russian).

Gaillard E., Savage J. (eds.) (1999) Fouchard, Gaillard, Goldman on International Commercial Arbitration, Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer.

Gevorgyan K.G. (2012) “Odnostoronnie sanktsii” i mezhdunarodnoe pravo [Unilateral sanctions and international law]. Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn', no.8. Available at: https://interaffairs.ru/jauthor/material/720 (accessed: 08.11.2020). (In Russian).

Glandin S.V. (2020) Dogovor zayma popal pod sanktsii. Kak sudy Ukrainy vnosyat disbalans v ekonomicheskie interesy uchastnikov oborota [The loan agreement came under sanctions. How the courts of Ukraine introduce an imbalance in the economic interests of economic agents]. Zakon.ru. 2 April. Available at: https://zakon.ru/blog/2020/04/02/dogovor_zajma_popal_pod_sankcii__kak_sudy_ukrainy_vnosyat_disbalans_v_ekonomicheskie_interesy_uchast (accessed: 18.11.2020). (In Russian).

Karabel'nikov B.R. (2020) Rossiyskoe pravosudie zashchitit obizhennykh rossiyan [Russian justice will protect offended Russians]. Zakon, no.7, pp.109–121. (In Russian).

Kritskiy K.V. (2019) Sanktsii i odnostoronnie ogranichitel'nye mery v sovremennom mezhduna­rodnom prave: Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Sanctions and unilateral restrictive measures in modern international law: Cand. in law sci. diss.], Moscow. (In Russian).

Kroll K. (2020) Russia Reacts: Impact of Sanctions on International Arbitration Involving Russian Parties. CEE Legal Matters Magazine, vol.6, no.12, pp.52–53.

Kronke H., Nacimiento P., Otto D. et al. (2010) Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: A Global Commentary on the New York Convention, Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer.

Marossi A.Z., Bassett M.R. (eds.) (2015) Economic Sanctions under International Law: Unilateralism, Multilateralism, Legitimacy, and Consequences, The Hague: Asser Press: Springer.

Masumy N., El Azouzi S.R. (2020) The Arbitrability of Secondary Sanctions: A System with a Coherent Standard of Review. Kluwer Arbitration Blog. 24 May. Available at: http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2020/05/24/the-arbitrability-of-secondary-sanctions-a-system-with-a-coherent-standard-of-review/ (accessed: 18.11.2020).

Mills A. (2014) Rethinking Jurisdiction in International Law. British Yearbook of International Law, vol.84, no.1, pp.187–239.

Mutay I.M., Billebru E.V. (2015) Vybor arbitrazhnogo foruma razresheniya sporov v svete sanktsiy protiv Rossii [Choice of arbitration venue in light of sanctions against Russia]. In: Asoskov A.V., Muranov A.I., Khodykin R.M. (eds.) Novye gorizonty mezhdunarodnogo arbitrazha: sbornik statey [New horizons of international arbitration: a collection of essays], vol.3, Moscow: Tsifra zakona, pp.49–70. (In Russian).

Palmer S. (2015) When Will the English Court Agree to Be a “Forum of Necessity” for Foreign Litigants? Transnational Notes. 30 January. Available at: https://blogs.law.nyu.edu/transnational/2015/01/when-will-the-english-court-agree-to-be-a-forum-of-necessity-for-foreign-litigants/ (accessed: 18.11.2020).

Sitkareva E.V. (2016) Antiiskovye mery: rol' i mesto v rossiyskoy pravoprimenitel'noy praktike [Anti-suit injunctions: Russian court practice approaches]. Probely v rossiyskom zakonodatel'stve, no.6, pp.62–65. (In Russian).

Skvortsov O.Yu., Savranskiy M.Yu., Sevast'yanov G.V. (eds.) (2018) Mezhdunarodnyy kommer­cheskiy arbitrazh: uchebnik [International commercial arbitration: a handbook], 2nd ed., Saint Petersburg: Redaktsiya zhurnala “Treteyskiy sud”; Moscow: Statut. (In Russian).

Szabados T. (2018) EU Economic Sanctions in Arbitration. Journal of International Arbitration, vol.35, no.4, pp.439–462.

Yadykin A.I. (2013) Institut “antiiskovykh obespechitel'nykh mer” (anti-suit injunctions) i vozmozhnost' ego primeneniya rossiyskimi sudami v svyazi s osushchestvleniem treteyskogo razbiratel'stva [Institute of anti-suit injunctions and possibility of its application in connection with arbitration by Russian courts]. In: Asoskov A.V., Vilkova N.G., Khodykin R.M. (eds.) Novye gorizonty mezhdunarodnogo arbitrazha: sbornik statey [New horizons of international arbitration: a collection of essays], vol.1, Moscow: Infotropik Media, pp.220–268. (In Russian).

Yarkov V.V. (2014) Primenenie rossiyskikh antiiskovykh obespechitel'nykh mer rossiyskimi sudami: pochemu by i net? [Application of Russian anti-suit injunctions by Russian courts: why not?]. Zakon, no.8, pp.84–92. (In Russian).