Impact of digitalization on international human rights standards and States’ obligations to comply with them

Available in Russian

Price 150 rub.

Authors: Andrey Nikolaev, Ekaterina Alisievich, Kristina Keburiya

DOI: 10.21128/2226-2059-2021-4-57-76

Keywords: digital rights; digitalization; human rights; international obligations of States in human rights; personal data; right to access the Internet

Abstract

Digitalization is a process of transformation of common things to a qualitatively new level relevant to current realities, in which technical progress has affected all spheres of human life. It has particularly also changed the approaches to the implementation of human rights and freedoms. In scientific and practical circles there is an essential discussion concerning so-called “digital” human rights. The need to determine the legal nature of “digital” human rights comes to the fore: are they new human rights or should we talk only about the same recognized rights realized online? The authors of this scientific article share the latter point of view, according to which “digital” human rights do not create new rights but are only a different environment for traditional human rights’ application. In the same vein, the question applies to universal and regional human rights mechanisms, which do not speak about the emergence of new rights but about the expansion of the realization of human rights and their transfer to the online space. At the same time, traditional human rights remain essentially unchanged while specific forms of their implementation in the digital environment appear. Digitalization does not create new, qualitatively different obligations for observing “digital” human rights for States and other subjects of international law. Thus one can positively assert the importance of the development of digital technologies which make it possible to globally expand the scope of human rights and freedoms and create an open space via the Internet which allows faster and more accurate access to information, including human rights, and makes it easier and borderless to communicate and express opinions freely. However, this phenomenon also has negative sides, reflected primarily in the increase of monopolies, both State and private, on the Internet and the related violation of the private life of Internet users.

About the authors: Ekaterina Alisievich – Candidate of Sciences (Ph.D.) in Law, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of International and Integrational Law, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia; Andrey Nikolaev – Doctor of Sciences in Law, Professor, Department of International and Integrational Law, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia; Kristina Keburiya – Candidate of Sciences (Ph.D.) in Law, Associate Professor of the Department of International and Integrational Law, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Moscow, Russia.

Citation: Alisievich E., Nikolaev A., Keburiya K. (2021) Vliyanie tsifrovizatsii na mezhdunarodnye standarty v oblasti prav cheloveka i obyazatel'stva gosudarstv po ikh soblyudeniyu [Impact of digitalization on international human rights standards and States’ obligations to comply with them]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 57–76. (In Russian).

References

De Hert P., Kloza D. (2012) Internet (Access) as a New Fundamental Right. Inflating the Current Rights Framework? European Journal of Law and Technology, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1–23.

Dorskaya A. A. (2020) Transformatsiya prava v usloviyakh tsifrovogo regulirovaniya obshchestvennykh otnosheniy: krizisnye yavleniya i novye vozmozhnosti [Transformation of law in the context of digital regulation of public relations: crises and new opportunities]. In: Vorontsova I. V. (ed.) Transformatsiya i tsifrovizatsiya pravovogo regulirovaniya obshchestvennykh otnosheniy v sovremennykh realiyakh i usloviyakh pandemii: kollektivnaya monografiya [Transformation and digitalization of legal regulation of public relations in modern realities and conditions of a pandemic: a collective monograph], Kazan: Otechestvo, pp. 11–15. (In Russian).

Flew T., Iosifides P., Steemers J. (eds.) (2016) Global Media and National Policies: The Return of the State, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Shablinsky I. (2021) Svoboda vyrazheniya mneniy i uvazhenie chastnoy zhizni v kontekste razvitiya novykh informatsionnykh tekhnologiy: sudebnaya praktika ESPCh i natsional'nykh sudov [Freedom of expression and respect for private life in the context of the development of new information technologies: judicial practice of the ECHR and national courts]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 141–156. (In Russian).

Shcherbovich A. A. (2015) Konstitutsionnoe pravo na dostup k Internetu: mirovoy opyt i vyvody dlya Rossii [Constitutional right to internet access: world experience and conclusions for Russia]. Kopirayt, no. 3, pp. 57–70. (In Russian).

Zor'kin V. D. (2018) Pravo v tsifrovom mire: Razmyshlenie na polyakh Peterburgskogo mezhduna­rodnogo yuridicheskogo foruma [Law in the digital world. Reflection on the sidelines of the Saint-Petersburg International Legal Forum]. Rossiyskaya gazeta, 29 May, no. 115. (In Russian).