IJ №4 (24) 2017
Jurisdictional immunities of foreign States at the stage of recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards in Russia

Abstract 
The article addresses the issue whether the conclusion of an arbitration agreement by a foreign State by itself implies under Russian law that the foreign State has waived its immunity from jurisdiction for the purposes of the subsequent recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award in the courts where the assets of the debtor-State are located. The issue is resolved from the perspective of both commercial and investment arbitration. The article comments on the judgment of the Commercial Court for the Moscow Circuit dated 29 August 2017 in Tatneft v Ukraine (А40-67511/2017). The article further offers interpretation of an arbitration exception under Article 6(2) of the Federal Law dated 3 November 2015 No.297-FZ “On jurisdictional immunities of the foreign State and assets of the foreign State in the Russian Federation”. The article derives the offered interpretation from travaux préparatoires to the Law, the UN Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of the States and Their Property, other treaties and soft law instruments on the issues of State immunity, European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, State practice and customary international law. Along the line, the article offers interpretation of the ambiguous Article 17 of the UN Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of the States and Their Property based on a detailed analysis of travaux préparatoires to it, summarizes State practice on the issue whether the fact of the State’s entering into arbitration agreement as such can be deemed a waiver of immunity from jurisdiction for the purposes of subsequent recognition and enforcement of the arbitral award, and opines on the state of customary law on the same issue.

About the author
Alexey Vyalkov – Magister Juris (University of Oxford, the United Kingdom); practitioner; Moscow, Russia.

Citation
Vyalkov A. (2017) Sudebnye immunitety inostrannykh gosudarstv na stadii prisnania i privedenia v ispolnenie resheniy arbitrazhey v Rossii [Jurisdictional immunities of foreign States at the stage of recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards in Russia]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, no.4, pp.89–121. (In Russian).

References

Bachand F. (2009) Overcoming Immunity-Based Objections to the Recognition and Enforcement in Canada of Investor-State Awards. Journal of International Arbitration, vol.26, no.1, pp.59–87.

Bjorklund A.K. (2009) State Immunity and Enforcement of Investor-State Arbitral Awards. In: Binder C., Kriebaum U., Reinisch A., Wittich S. (eds.) International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Broches A. (1972) The Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States. Recueil des Cours, vol.136, pp.331–410.

Fox H., Webb P. (2015) The Law of State Immunity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Grant J.P., Barker J.C. (2007) Harvard Research in International Law: Contemporary Analysis and Appraisal, New York: Hein and Co.

Huseynli K. (2017) Enforcement of Investment Arbitration Awards: Problems and Solutions. Baku State University Law Review, vol.3, no.1, pp.40–74.

Juratowitch B. (2016) Waiver of State Immunity and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards. Asian Journal of International Law, vol.6, no.2, pp.199–232.

Khlestova I.O. (2004) Immunitet inostrannogo gosudarstva i mezhdunarodnyy kommercheskiy arbitrazh [Immunity of a foreign state and international commercial arbitration]. Mezhdunarodnyy kommercheskiy arbit­razh, no.3, pp.5–15.

Kläger R. (2014) Werner Schneider (liquidator of Walter Bau AG) v Kingdom of Thailand: Sovereign Immunity in Recognition and Enforcement Proceedings under German Law. ICSID Review, vol.29, no.1, pp.142–148.

Korolev A. (2016) Systemic Balancing and Regional Hedging: China–Russia Relations. Chinese Journal of International Politics, vol.9, no.4, pp.375–397.

Lepard B.D. (2010) Customary International Law: A New Theory with Practical Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mälksoo L. (2015) Russain Approaches to International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mendelson M.H. (1998) The Formation of Customary International Law. Recueil des Cours, vol.272, pp.155–410.

Nersesyants V.S. (2012) Obshchaya teoriya prava i gosudarstva: uchebnik [The General theory of the state and law], Moscow: Norma: Infra-M. (In Russian).

Orakhelashvili A. (2008) The Interpretation of Acts and Rules in Public International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Parlett K. (2013) Article 17. In: O’Keefe R., Tams C., Tzanakopoulos A. (eds.). The United Nations Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Their Property: A Commentary, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.278–286.

Saganek P. (2015) Unilateral Acts of States in Public International Law, Leiden; Boston: Brill Nijhof.

Spaccaquerche Barbosa F. (2009) The Enforcement of International Investment Arbitral Awards: is There a Better Way? Revista Brasileira de Arbitrage, vol.VI, no.21, pp.7–34.

Troboff P.D. (1986) Foreign State Immunity: Emerging Consensus on Principles. Recueil des Cours, vol.200, pp.235–432.

Zhu L. (2007) State Immunity from Measures of Constraints for the Property of Foreign Central Banks. Chinese Journal of International Law, vol.6, no.1, pp.67–81.

Zhu L. (2012) Chinese Practice in Public International Law: 2011. Chinese Journal of Intinternational Law, vol.11, no.3, pp.541–607.

Issue articles