The article compares approaches to the principle of legal certainty employed in the jurisprudence of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany and that of the Russian Constitutional Court. Since the problem of legal certainty is not limited to criminal law alone, the author’s analysis is not limited to criminal cases. In some way, uncertainty in criminal law is inevitable due to the general nature of the law language – unavoidable use of generalizations, its brevity and conciseness. Nevertheless, the legislator is responsible for drafting legal norms as clearly as possible in order to prevent arbitrary court decisions. Thus, the principle of legal certainty sets requirements not only to the law enforcement, but also to the law itself. Author concludes that the Federal Constitutional Court pays much more attention to argumentation in its decisions as compared to the judicial practice of the Russian Constitutional Court. However, in certain cases instead of deciding the uncertain law unconstitutional, the Federal Constitutional Court chose to correct the law and precedents. Such approach is rather arguable from the point of view of the role of legislator in offense qualification, which was actually stated by the Federal Constitutional Court itself. If the Russian Constitutional Court would take a more detailed and profound view into of consistency of a legal rule with the constitutional principle of legal certainty, and make in its decisions the legislator responsible for certainty of law (or, at least, explain the proper law enforcement), the effectiveness of the Russian Constitutional Court judgments would not only increase, but also allow the legislator more clearly ensure constitutionally acceptable level of the legal uncertainty.
About the author
Anton Alatortsev- Ph.D. student, Faculty of Law, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Alatortsev A. (2017) Problema opredelyonnosti ugolovnogo zakona v resheniyakh Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossii i Federal’nogo konstitutsionnogo suda Germanii [Legal certainty of the criminal law in case-law of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany and the Russian Constitutional Court]. Sravnitel’noye konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, no.1, pp.118–133. (In Russian).
Blokhin P.D. (2014) Zashchita osnovnykh prav sredstvami konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya v Germanii [Protection of fundamental rights by means of constitutional justice in Germany]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, no.3, pp.81–104. (In Russian).
Bohlander M. (2009) Principles of German Criminal Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Bröhmer J., Hill C., Spitzkatz M. (eds.) (2012) 60 Years German Basic Law: The German Constitution and its Court: Landmark Decisions of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany in the Area of Fundamental Rights, 2nd ed., Ampang: The Malaysian Current Law Journal Sdn Bhd.
Dubber M.D., Hörnle T. (2014) Criminal Law: A Comparative Approach, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Elinsky A.V. (2012) Problemy ugolovnogo prava v konstitutsionnom izmerenii [Criminal law problems in constitutional dimension], Moscow: Yurlitinform. (In Russian).
Golovko L.V. (2012) Neobkhodimost’ prinyatiya organizatsionnykh mer po preodoleniyu negativnykh tendentsiy razvitiya ugolovnogo i ugolovno-processual’nogo zakonodatel’stva [Necessity of organizational measures for overcoming the negative trends of development of criminal law and criminal procedure].Zakon, no.9, pp.70–82. (In Russian).
Golovnenkov P.V. (2015) Ugolovnoe ulozhenie (Ugolovnyy kodeks) Federativnoy Respubliki Germaniya: nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy i perevod teksta zakona [Criminal Code of the German Federal Republic: doctrinal and practical commentary and translation], 2nd ed., Moscow: Prospekt. (In Russian).
Hallevy G.A. (2010) Modern Treatise on the Principle of Legality in Criminal Law, Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
Hanly K. (2006) An Introduction to Irish Criminal Law, Dublin: Gill & Macmillan Ltd.
Kibalnik A., Solomenko N. (2008) “Ekstremistskoe” huliganstvo – nonsens ugolovnogo zakona [“Extremist” hooliganism – nonsense of the criminal law]. Zakonnost’, no.4, pp.21–23. (In Russian).
Kolokolov N.A. (2014) Huliganstvo: genezis, evolyutsiya i sovremennoe sostoyanie sostava prestupleniya. Stat’ya 1. Istoriya razvitiya pravovogo regulirovaniya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za huliganstvo v Rossii [Hooliganism: genesis, evolution and current state of crime definition. Article 1. Development of legal regulation of criminal responsibility for hooliganism in Russia]. Mirovoy sudya, no.2, pp.2–8. (In Russian).
Kommers D.P. (1997) The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany, Dunham; London: Duke University Press.
Kunashev A. (2010) Huliganstvo kak prestuplenie s dvumya osnovnymi motivami [Hooliganism as crime with two main motives]. Zakonnost’, no.2, pp.44–47. (In Russian).
Lautenbach G. (2013) The Concept of the Rule of Law and the European Court of Human Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lopashenko N.A. (2009) Ugolovnaya politika [Criminal policy], Moscow: Wolters Kluwer. (In Russian).
Maklakov V.V. (ed.) (2000) Konstitutsii zarubezhnykh gosudarstv [Constitutions of foreign countries], 2nd ed., Moscow: BEK. (In Russian).
Murphy C. (2010) The Principle of Legality in Criminal Law under the ECtHR. European Human Rights Law Review, vol.2, no.2, pp.192–207.
Pokrovsky I.A. (2013) Osnovnye problemy grazhdanskogo prava [Big issues in the civil law], Moscow: Statut. (In Russian).
Pryakhina T.M. (2014) Pravovaya neopredelyonnost’ zakona [Legal uncertainty of the law]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya «Yuridicheskie nauki», no.2, pp.38–44. (In Russian).
Shapiro S.J. (2011) Legality, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schumann H. (2005) Criminal Law and the Penal Code. In: Reimann M., Zekoll J. (eds.) Introduction to German Law, The Hague: Kluwer Law International, pp.387–418.
Vlasenko N.A. (2015) Problemy pravovoy opredelyonnosti [The question of legal uncertainty], Moscow: Infra-M. (In Russian).
Zemtsova A.V. (2013) Problemy primeneniya stat’i 159.4 (Moshennichestvo v sfere predprinimatel’skoy deyatel’nosti) Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii v oblasti protivodeistviya moshennicheskim deistviyam v byudzhetnoy sfere [Problems of application of the article 159.4 (Business fraud) of the Criminal code of the Russian Federation in the counteraction to fraud in the budget sphere]. Rossiyskiy Sledovatel’, no.16, pp.28–32.
Zhalinsky A.E. (2009) Ugolovnoe parvo v ozhidanii peremen: teoretiko-instrumental’nyy analiz [Criminal law – new expectations: theoretical and instrumental analysis], Moscow: Prospekt. (In Russian).
Moscow, Shchepkina str., 8
+7 (495) 608-69-59
+7 (495) 608-66-35