CCR №2 (123) 2018
Basic assumptions of comparative legal history today

Abstract
Recent rapid changes in the world have put all legal traditions to the test. In Europe they are boosting interest in comparative legal history and research into factors of legal development through a comparative analysis of two or more jurisdictions of the Old World. This new approach is generating vivid debates and yielding some valuable publications. Yet its methodology is far from clear. Does comparative legal history have methods of its own? Or does it borrow methods from comparative law? To resolve this complicated issue, one must look at the basic assumptions of comparative study in contemporary law and its history because they assure the compatibility of specific methods. In this article the author investigates such common basic assumptions as the complex and less coherent picture of law in the past and present (as compared to the scientific perception in the late 19th and early 20th centuries), the multilinear evolution of law, interconnectedness and legal traditions, the persistence of ubiquitous legal transplants due to cross-cultural influences, and flexible regularities of legal development. These basic assumptions allow for several methodological conclusions in comparative research. The complex vision of law and its multi-factor development necessitate a combination of various methods of research. Cross-cultural influences and the socio-cultural environment of law add value to a comparative approach in understanding apparent and hidden factors of legal development. A predominantly realistic interest of many legal historians in comprehending how law actually shaped social relations brings to the frontline of their methodology the functional method of comparative law that aims at discovering the link between social problems and their legal solutions. Finally, the compatibility of basic assumptions paves the way for several common academic goals and the object of comparative research in legal history and contemporary law. All the above justifies attempts to build on the methods of comparative law in the domain of comparative legal history.

About the author
Dmitry Poldnikov – Doctor of Sciences in Law, Professor, Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia.

Citation 
Poldnikov D. (2018) Bazovye posylki sovremennykh sravnitel’nykh issledovaniy istorii prava [Basic assumptions of comparative legal history today]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.27, no.2, pp.68–85. (In Russian).

References

Abásolo E. (2014) Aportes del comparatismo juridico al estudio de la circulación de ideas normativas en Europa y América durante la primera mitad del siglo XX. La cultura juridica latinoamericana y la circulación de ideas durante la primera mitad del siglo XX, Buenos Aires: Instituto de Investigaciones de Historia del Derecho, pp.11–21.

Barber B.R. (1996) Jihad vs. McWorld, New York: Ballantine Books.

Barenboim P.D. (1997) Pervaya konstitutsiya mira. Bibleyskie korni nezavisimogo suda [The first constitution of the world. Biblical roots of an independent court], Moscow: Belye al’vy. (In Russian).

Barg M.A. (1983) O dvukh urovnyakh istoricheskogo poznaniya [About two levels of historic cognition]. Voprosy filosofii, no.8, pp.107–114. (In Russian).

Berman H.J. (1994) Zapadnaya traditsiya prava: epokha formirovaniya [Western tradition of law: the era of formation], Moscow: Publishing house of Moscow State University. (In Russian).

Cabriac R. (2007) Kodifikatsii [Codification], Moscow: Statut. (In Russian).

Cavalli-Sforza L.L. (2001) Genes, peoples and languages, M.Seielstad (transl.), London: Penguin Books.

Chestnov I.L. (2012) Postklassicheskaya teoriya prava [Postclassic theory of law], Saint Petersburg: Izdatel’skiy dom “Alef Press”. (In Russian).

Choudhry S. (2006) Migration as a New Metaphor in Comparative Constitutional Law. In: Choudhry S. (ed.) The Migration of Constitutional Ideas, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, pp.17–25.

Coing H. (1990) Europäisierung der Rechtswissenschaft. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, vol.43, no.15, pp.937–941.

Dannemann G. (2008) Comparative Law: Study of Similarities or Differences? In: Reimann M., Zimmermann R. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.383–419.

Darest R. (1894) Issledovaniya po istorii prava [Research on the history of law], N.N.Chebotarevskiy (transl.), Saint Petersburg: L.F.Panteleev. (In Russian).

Duve Th. (ed.) (2014) Entanglements in Legal History: Conceptual Approaches, Frankfurt am Main: Max Planck Institute for European Legal History.

Frankenberg G. (2012) Constitutional Transfer: The IKEA Theory Revisited. International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol.8, no.3, pp.563–579.

Fukuyama F. (2012) The Origins of Political Order: From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Giaro T. (2006) Pravovaya traditsiya Vostochnoy Evropy: Epitafiya [Legal tradition of Eastern Europe: Epitaph]. In: B.L.Khaskel’berg, D.O.Tuzov (eds.) Tsivilisticheskie issledovaniya: Ezhegodnik grazhdanskogo prava. No.2, Moscow: Statut, pp.127–147. (In Russian).

Giaro T. (2007) Zapad na Vostoke. Modernizatsiya vostochnoevropeyskogo prava do Vtoroy mirovoy voyny [West in the East. Modernization of Eastern European Law before World War II]. In: B.L.Khaskel’berg, D.O.Tuzov (eds.) Tsivilisticheskie issledovaniya: Ezhegodnik grazhdanskogo prava. No.3, Moscow: Statut, pp.173–199. (In Russian).

Giaro T. (2013) Some Prejudices about the Legal Tradition of Eastern Europe. In: Sitek B., Szczerbowski J.J., Bauknecht A.W. (eds.) Comparative Law in Eastern and Central Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp.26–50.

Glenn P. (2012) On the origins of peoples and of laws. In: Melkevik B., Varga C. (eds.) Standing tall: hommages à Csaba Varga, Budapest: Pázmány Press.

Glenn P. (2014) Legal Traditions of the World: Sustainable Diversity in Law, 5th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Goldman D.B. (2007) Globalisation and the Western Legal Tradition: Recurring Patterns of Law and Authority Law in Context, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gordley J. The Functional Method. In: Monateri P.J. (ed.) Methods of Comparative Law, Cheltenham; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.107–119.

Gordley J. (2003) The Universalist Heritage. In: Legrand P., Munday R. (eds.) Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.31–45.

Gordley J. (2008) Comparative Law and Legal History. In: Reimann M., Zimmermann R. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.753–773.

Graziadei M. (2008) Comparative Law as the Study of Transplants and Receptions. In: Reimann M., Zimmermann R. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.441–475.

Hattenhauer H. (2004) Europäische Rechtsgeschichte, 4th ed., Heidelberg: C.F.Müller.

Heirbaut D. (2012) Exploring the Law in Medieval Minds. In: Musson A., Stebbings Ch. (eds.) Making Legal History: Approaches and Methodologies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.118–130.

Ibbetson D. (2012). Comparative legal history: A Methodology. In: Musson A., Stebbings Ch. (eds.) Making Legal History: Approaches and Methodologies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.131–145.

Jansen N., Michaels R. (2007) Private Law and the State: Comparative Perceptions and Historical Observations. The Rabel Journal of Comparative and International Private Law, vol.71, no.2, pp.345–397.

Kashanina T.V. (2017) Evolyutsionnye zakonomernosti prava [Evolutionary patterns of law]. Aktual’nye problemy rossiyskogo prava, no.12, pp.44–53. (In Russian).

Khachaturyan N.A. (1992) Evolyutsiya gosudarstva v srednevekovoy Evrope s drevneyshikh vremyon do kontsa XV v. [Evolution of state in medieval Europe before the end of the 15th century]. In: Istoriya Evropy. T.2: Srednevekovaya Evropa [History of Europe. Vol.2: Medieval Europe], Moscow: Nauka, pp.487–508. (In Russian).

Kovalevsky M.M. (1880) Istoriko-sravnitel’nyy metod v yurisprudentsii i priyomy izucheniya istorii prava[Comparative-historical method in jurisprudence and methods of studying the history of law], Moscow: Tipografiya F.B.Millera. (In Russian).

Kovalevsky M.M. (1899) Sravnitel’no-istoricheskoe pravovedenie i ego otnoshenie k sotsiologii: Metody sravnitel’nogo izucheniya prava [Comparative-historical jurisprudence and its relation to sociology: Methods of comparative law study]. In: Gambarov Yu.S. (ed.) Sbornik po obshchestvenno-yuridicheskim naukam. No.1, Saint Petersburg: O.N.Popova, pp.1–29. (In Russian).

Krasnov М.А. (2014) Konstitutsionnye strakhi [Constitutional fears]. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal’noe pravo, no.6. pp.3–11. (In Russian).

Lafitsky V.I. (2010) Sravnitel’noe pravovedenie v obrazakh prava [Comparative law in the images of law], Moscow: Statut. (In Russian).

Lambert E. (1903) La fonction du droit civil comparé. T.1: Les conceptions étroites ou unilatérales, Paris: V.Giard & E.Brière.

Langer M. (2004) From Legal Transplants to Legal Translations: The Globalization of Plea Bargaining and the Americanization Thesis in Criminal Procedure. Harvard International Law Journal, vol.45, no.1, pp.1–64.

Legrand P. (2016) Le droit comparé, Paris: PUF.

Legrand P. (2001) What “Legal Transplants”? In: Nelken D., Feest J. (eds.) Adapting Legal Culture, Oxford; Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, pp.55–69.

Maine H.S. (1873) Drevnee pravo: Ego svyaz’ s drevney istoriey obshchestva i ego otnoshenie k noveyshim ideyam [Ancient Law. Its connection with the ancient history of society and its attitude to the latest ideas], N.Belozerskaya (transl.), Saint Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo D.E.Kozhanchikova. (In Russian).

Mal’tsev G.V. (2013) Kul’turnye traditsii prava [Cultural traditions of law], Moscow: Norma; INFRA-M. (In Russian).

Mańko R., Sulikowski A., Łakomy J. (eds.) (2018) Law, Ideology and the Political: Central and Eastern European Perspectives, Abington: Routledge.

Mayer-Maly T. (1971) Die Wiederkehr von Rechtsfiguren. JuristenZeitung, vol.26, no.1. pp.1–3.

Medushevsky A.N. (2014) Rossiyskaya pravovaya traditsiya – opora ili pregrada? [Is the Russian legal tradition a pillar or a barrier?], Moscow: Fond “Liberal’naya missiya”. (In Russian).

Menski W. (2006) Comparative Law in a Global Context: The Legal Systems of Asia and Africa, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Michaels R. (2008) The Functional Method of Comparative Law. In: Reimann M., Zimmermann R. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.339–382.

Mogil’nitskiy B.G. (1997) Ob istoricheskoy zakonomernosti kak predmete istoricheskoy nauki [On historical regularity as an object of historical science]. Novaya i noveyshaya istoriya, no.2, pp.3–15. (In Russian).

Monateri P.J. (2012) Methods in Comparative Law: An Intellectual Overview. In: Methods of Comparative Law, Cheltenham; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.7–24.

Müssig U. (ed.) (2016) Reconsidering Constitutional Formation I National Sovereignty: A Comparative Analysis of the Juridification by Constitution, Heidelberg; New York: Springer Open.

Nelken D. (2003) Comparatists and transferability. In: Legrand P., Munday R. (eds.) Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.437–466.

Örücü E. (2002) Law as Transposition. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol.51, no.2, pp.205–223.

Padoa-Schioppa A. (2017) History of Law in Europe: From the Early Middle Ages to the Twentieth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Parise А. (2017) The Value of Comparative Legal History for American Civil Law Jurisdiction. In: Parise А. Ownership Paradigms in American Civil Law Jurisdictions: Manifestations of the Shifts in the Legislation of Louisiana, Chile, and Argentina (16th-20th centuries), Leiden; Boston, MA: Brill, pp.25–55.

Peller G. (1985) The Metaphysics of American Law. California Law Review, vol.73, no.4, pp.1151–1290.

Pihlajamäki H. (2015) Comparative Contexts in Legal History: Are We All Comparatists Now? In: Adams M., Heirbaut D. (eds.) The Method and Culture of Comparative Law: Essays in Honour of Mark Van Hoecke, Oxford; Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, pp.121–132.

Prigozhin I., Stengers I. (1986) Poryadok iz khaosa: Novyy dialog cheloveka s prirodoy [Order from chaos: A new dialogue between man and nature], V.I.Arshinov, Yu.L.Klimontovich, Yu.V.Sachkova (eds.), Moscow: Progress. (In Russian).

Rabel E. (1967) Aufgabe und Notwendigkeit der Rechtsvergleichung, 1924. In: Rabel E. Gesammelte Aufsätze. Bd.3: Arbeiten zur Rechtsvergleichung und zur Rechtsvereinheitlichung: 1919–1954, H.G.Leser (ed.), Tübingen: J.C.B.Mohr, pp.1–21.

Reimann M., Zimmermann R. (eds.) (2008) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rosenfeld M.; Sajó A. (eds.) (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ross R.J. (2008) Legal Communications and Imperial Governance: British North America and Spanish America Compared. In: Tomlins Ch., Grossberg M. (eds.) Cambridge History of Law in America. Vol.1: Early America (1580–1815), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.104–143.

Sacco R. (1991) Legal Formants: A Dynamic Approach to Comparative Law (Installment I of II). American Journal of Comparative Law, vol.39, no.1, pp.1–34.

Samuel G. (2014) An Introduction to Comparative Law Theory and Method, Oxford; Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.

Schriewer J. (2003) Problemdimensionen sozialwissenschaftlicher Komparatistik. In: Kaelble H., Schriewer J. (eds.) Vergleich und Transfer: Komparatistik in den Sozial-, Geschichts- und Kulturwissenschaften, Frankfurt am Main: Campus, pp.9–54.

Schröder J. (2012) Recht als Wissenschaft: Geschichte der juristischen Methodenlehre in der Neuzeit, München: C.H.Beck.

Shershenevich G.F. (1898) Zadachi i metody grazhdanskogo pravovedeniya [Tasks and methods of civil law], Kazan‘: Typolithography of the Imperial University. (In Russian).

Sinyukov V.N. (2010) Rossiyskaya pravovaya sistema: Vvedenie v obshchuyu teoriyu [Russian legal system. Introduction to the general theory], 2nd ed., Moscow: Norma. (In Russian).

Steward J.H. (1949) Cultural Causality and Law: A Trial Formulation of the Development of Early Civilizations. American Anthropologist, no.51, no.1, pp.1–27.

Stolleis M. (2008) Rechtsgeschichte schreiben: Rekonstruktion, Erzählung, Fiktion? Basel: Schwabe.

Stolleis M. (2012) Geschichte des öffentlichen Rechts in Deutschland. Bd.4: Staats- und Verwaltungsrechtswissenschaft in West und Ost, 1945–1990, München: C.H.Beck.

Stolleis M. (2014) Öffentliches Recht in Deutschland: Eine Einführung in seine Geschichte (16.-21. Jahrhundert), München: C.H.Beck.

Trigger B.G. (2003) Understanding Early Civilizations: A Comparative Study, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Vacca L. (ed.) (2001) Ricerca storica e indagine comparatistica: un primo bilancio, Torino: G.Giappichelli.

Valcke C., Grellette M. (2015) Three Functions of Function in Comparative Legal Studies. In: Adams M., Heirbaut D. (eds.) The Method and Culture of Comparative Law: Essays in Honour of Mark Van Hoecke, Oxford; Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, pp.99–111.

Van Caenegem R.C. (2003) An Historical Introduction to Western Constitutional Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Van Dongen E.G.D. (2014) Contributory Negligence: A Historical and Comparative Study, Leiden; Boston, MA: Brill.

Van Rhee C.H. (2010) Within a Reasonable Time: The History of Due and Undue Delay in Civil Litigation, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

Vetyutnev Yu.Yu. (2006) Gosudarstvenno-pravovye zakonomernosti: Vvedenie v teoriyu [State legal patterns: Introduction to theory], Elista: NPP “Dzhangar”. (In Russian).

Von Bogdandy A. (2013) Comparative Constitutional Law: A Continental Perspective. In: Rosenfeld M., Sajó A. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.25–38.

Waelkens L. (2015) Amne Adverso: Roman Legal Heritage in European Culture, Leuven: Leuven University Press.

Watson A. (1993) Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law, 2nd ed., Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.

Wesel U. (2010) Geschichte des Rechts in Europa: von den Griechen bis zum Vertrag von Lissabon, München: C.H.Beck.

Whitman J.Q. (2004) The Two Western Cultures of Privacy: Dignity versus Liberty. Yale Law Journal, vol.113, no.6, pp.1151–1222.

Zhidkov O.A., Krasheninnikova N.A. (eds.) (1996) Istoriya gosudarstva i prava zarubezhnykh stran. Ch.1[History of the state and law of foreign countries. Part 1], Moscow: Norma. (In Russian).

Zimmermann R. (2005) Rimskoe pravo i garmonizatsiya chastnogo prava v Evrope [Roman law and the harmonization of private law in Europe]. Drevnee pravo, vol.15, no.1, pp.156–176. (In Russian).

Zweigert K., Kötz H. (2000) Vvedenie v sravnitel’noe pravovedenie v sfere chastnogo prava [Introduction to Comparative Law], Yu.M.Yumashev (transl.), Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. (In Russian).

Issue articles