CCR №2 (141) 2021
Constitutional rights and freedoms in the third Russian post-soviet republic

The full text of the article is available only in Russian.

Abstract

The main idea of the article is that most provisions of the amendment to the Russian Constitution, which was adopted in 2020, affect constitutional human rights in one way or another and limit them. The changes made by the amendment to the configuration of the state powers and the legal status of a man and the citizen, are so significant that the model of the Russian state organization installed after its introduction can be considered the third post-Soviet republic. We believe that the first post-Soviet republic was existing during the 90-s years of the XX century in our country. It was characterized by a significant commitment to the European standards. The second one covered the first two decades of the XXI century. It was characterized by the struggle of two inertial mechanisms: the new democratic one, which was launched in the period of the first republic, and the old dictatorial one, which did not cease to operate, and it has grown stronger while the new Russian political leadership was relying on it. The period of the third post-Soviet Russian Republic, which began together with the amendment-2020 to the Constitution, is characterized by the prevalence of elements of the dictatorial model of governing in our country. Within the context of the role of the amendment provisions in insuring of human rights, they can be divided into three categories: direct and indirect restrictions of human rights and neutral ones for their quantity and quality but intended for diverting attention from the rights restrictions imposed by the two first groups of the amendment provisions. Restrictions imposed by the amendment affect personal and political rights while false guaranties cover social rights. The direct restrictions on human rights mean impositions of prohibitions or duties on a person by the amendment. Indirect ones include the weakening the mechanism of checks and balances by means of strengthening the President power. The author concludes that the direct and indirect restrictions on personal and political rights do not pass the proportionality test, established by Russian Constitution (Part 3 of Article 55), being illegal for this reason.

About the author:
Irina Alebastrova — Doctor of Law, Head of Constitutional and International Law Department, All-Russian State University of Justice, Moscow, Russia

Citation: Alebastrova I. (2021) Konstitutsionnye prava i svobody cheloveka i grazhdanina v tret’ey postsovetskoy respublike v Rossii [Constitutional rights and freedoms in the third Russian post-soviet republic]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.30, no.2, pp.46–58. (In Russian).

References

Amar A.R. (2005) America’s Constitution: A Biography, New York: Random House.

Barber N.W. (2018) The Principles of Constitutionalism, Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

Dudko I.A., Kryazhkova O.N. (2020) Zashchita prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina v Rossiy­skoy Federatsii: uchebnoe posobie [Protection of human rights and freedoms in the Russian Federation: a study guide], Moscow: Rossiyskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet pravosudiya. (In Russian).

Fukuyama F. (2006) Sil’noe gosudarstvo. Upravlenie i mirovoy poryadok v XXI veke [State building. Governance and world order in the twenty-first century], O.E.Kolesnikov, N.G.Krotovskaya, V.S.Kulagina-Yartseva and others (transl.), Moscow: AST. (In Russian).

Furman D. (2007) Obshchee i osobennoe v politicheskom razvitii postsovetskikh gosudarstv [Common and special in the political development of the post-soviet states]. In: Lipman M., Ryabova A. (eds.) Puti rossiyskogo postkommunizma: ocherki [The ways of Russian post-communism: essays], Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Ruslana Elinina, pp.234–272. (In Russian).

Strashun B.A. (ed.) (2005) Konstitutsionnoe (gosudarstvennoe) pravo zarubezhnykh stran. Obshchaya chast’: uchebnik dlya vuzov [Constitutional (state) law of foreign countries. The general part: a study guide for universities], Moscow: Norma. (In Russian).

Krasnov M.A., Shablinsky I.G. (2008) Rossiyskaya sistema vlasti: treugol’nik s odnim uglom [Russian system of power: a triangle with one angle], Moscow: Institut prava i publichnoy politiki. (In Russian).

Levinson L. (2013) Dopustimyy uroven’ “beznravstvennosti”: evropeyskoe pravo i traditsionnye tsennosti [Admissible level of “immorality”: European law and traditional values]. Gosudarstvo, religiya, tserkov’ v Rossii i za rubezhom, no.2, pp.213–232. (In Russian).

Medushevsky A. (2020) Perekhod Rossii k konstitutsionnoy diktature: razmyshleniya o znachenii reformy 2020 goda [The Russia’s move to constitutional dictatorship: reflections on 2020 constitutional amendments]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.29, no.3, pp.33–50. (In Russian).

Partlett W. (2020) Popravki k Konstitutsii Rossii 2020 goda [Russia’s 2020 constitutional amendments]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.29, no.3, pp.51–62. (In Russian).

Soboleva A. (2020) Sotsial’nye prava v kontekste novykh polnomochiy Presidenta [Social rights in the context of new powers of the President]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.29, no.3, pp.82–96. (In Russian).

Soboleva A. (2020) Indeksatsiya slov. Pochemu “sotsial’nye” popravki v Konstitutsiyu ne tol’ko bessmyslenny, no i vredny [Word indexing. Why “social” amendments to the Constitution are not only meaningless, but also harmful]. The Insider, 28 March. Available at: https://theins.ru/politika/208840 (accessed: 22.03.2021). (In Russian).

Toffler A. (1999) Tret’ya volna [The third wave], P.S.Gurevich (transl.), Moscow: AST. (In Russian).

Issue articles