Appellate Body crisis, dispute settlement mechanisms in free trade agreements, free trade agreements, international trade disputes, World Trade Organization, параллельное судопроизводство в международном праве
The full text of the article is available only in Russian.
In January 2019, the European Union initiated a procedure of settlement of an inter-state trade dispute within the framework of a bilateral agreement between the European Union and Ukraine – the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement (DCFTA). This is one of the few examples of recourse to a dispute settlement mechanism provided by a free trade agreement: most international trade disputes between the parties to such agreements, upon the initiative of the claimant, are resolved within the WTO, despite the fact that the mechanisms of free trade agreements provide for shorter procedural terms than the WTO system and contain a number of other provisions that aim at optimizing dispute resolution mechanisms. The article analyzes the examples of the disputes, which were resolved within the framework of the regional mechanisms, and attemts to explain why the parties to these disputes made recourse to the dispute settlement mechanisms contained in these agreements. Special attention is paid to the practice of the European Union, which has begun to use the free trade agreement dispute settlement mechanisms, which might become an effcient alternative to the WTO dispute settlement mechanism. The article also touches upon the question of how the current situation around the WTO Appellate Body, which threatens the further existence of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism in its current form, influences the practice of the states. In the concluding part, the problem of the parallel proceedings in different systems of dispute settlement is analyzed, conclusions are drawn and recommendations are made on the possibility of avoiding the parallel procedures in different dispute settlement systems, inter alia, by consistently including provisions on the exclusiveness of the selected forum into the free trade agreements.
About the author:
Marina Trunk-Fedorova – Candidate of Sciences (Ph.D.) in Law, Associate Professor, Saint Petersburg State University; Associate Professor, Ural State Law University, Ekaterinburg, Russia
Citation: Trunk-Fedorova M. (2019) Razreshenie sporov v ramkakh soglasheniy o svobodnoy torgovle: al’ternativa mekhanizmu Vsemirnoy torgovoy organizatsii? [Dispute settlement under free trade agreements: an alternative to the mechanism of the World Trade Organization?]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol.9, no.3, pp.102–113. (In Russian).
Bercero I.G. (2010) Dispute settlement in EU Free Trade Agreements, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Boklan D., Tonkikh P., Kozlova M. (2018) Spor Rossiya – Zheleznodorozhnoe oborudovanie i drugie spory ob osparivanii mer Evraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza v Organe po razresheniyu sporov VTO [Dispute Russia – Railway Equipment and other disputes about challenging measures of the Eurasian Economic Union in the WTO Dispute Settlement Body]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol.8, no.3, pp.14–27. (In Russian).
Chase C., Yanovich A., Crawford J.-A., Ugaz P. (2016) Mapping of dispute settlement mechanisms in regional trade agreements – innovative or variations on a theme? In: Acharya R. (ed.) Regional Trade Agreements and the Multilateral Trading System, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.608–702.
Davey W.J. (2006) Dispute Settlement in the WTO and RTAs: A Comment. In: Bartels L., Ortino F. (eds.) Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO Legal System, New York: Oxford University Press, pp.343–357.
Gantz D.A. (2018) Addressing Dispute Resolution Institutions in a NAFTA Renegotiation, Houston, TX: James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy of Rice University. Available at: https://www.bakerinstitute.org/media/files/files/fa4d9adf/mex-pub-nafta-040218-1.pdf (accessed: 17.09.2019).
Lester S. (2019) The Way to Address USMCA Panel Blocking is to Eliminate USMCA Panel Blocking. International Economic Law and Policy Blog, 12 July. Available at: https://ielp.worldtradelaw.net/2019/07/the-way-to-address-usmca-panel-blocking-is-to-eliminate-panel-blocking.html (accessed: 17.09.2019).
Matsushita M., Lee Y.S. (2008) Proliferation of Free Trade Agreements and Some Systemic Issues – In Relation to the WTO Disciplines and Development Perspectives. The Law and Development Review, vol.1, no.1, pp.23–50.
Panchenko Yu., Sidorenko S. (2018) Pilit’ les i ssorit’sya s ES: zachem Ukraine novyy moratoriy na vyvoz drevesiny [To saw wood and quarrel with the EU: why does Ukraine need a new moratorium on export of wood]. Evropejskaya Pravda. Available at: https://www.eurointegration.com.ua/rus/articles/2018/07/19/7084579/ (accessed: 18.09.2019). (In Russian).
Rachkov I. (2019) Tendentsii razvitiya mezhdunarodnogo investitsionnogo arbitrazha: voprosy po sushchestvu sporov [The tendencies of development of international investment arbitration: questions on the substance of disputes]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol.9, no.1, pp.93–117. (In Russian).
Reich A. (2017) The effectiveness of the WTO dispute settlement system: A statistical analysis: European University Institute Working Papers LAW 2017/11. Available at: https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/
47045/LAW_2017_11.pdf (accessed: 17.09.2019).
Shumilov V., Boklan D., Lifshits I., Trunk-Fedorova M., Loseva A., Pokatilova E. (eds.) (2018) Marrakeshskoe soglashenie ob uchrezhdenii Vsemirnoy torgovoy organizatsii: sbornik [Marrakesh Agreement establishing the World Trade Organization: collection of materials], Moscow: Yustitsinform. (In Russian).
Smbatyan A. (2011) VTO i integratsionnye ob’edineniya: sootnoshenie “pravovykh sil” v uregulirovanii torgovykh sporov [WTO and organizations of regional integration: “legal power” relationship in trade dispute resolution]. Rossiyskiy ehkonomicheskiy vestnik, no.8, pp.74–82. (In Russian).
Trunk-Fedorova M. (2005) Razreshenie sporov v ramkakh Vsemirnoy torgovoy organizatsii [Dispute settlement in the World Trade Organization], Saint Petersburg: Izdatel’skiy dom Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. (In Russian).
Trunk-Fedorova M. (2016) Voprosy transparentnosti v polozheniyakh o razreshenii sporov soglasheniy o svobodnoy torgovle EC v kontekste praktiki VTO [Transparency issues in the dispute settlement provisions of free trade agreements of the EU in the context of WTO practice]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol.6, no.1, pp.70–80. (In Russian).
Trunk-Fedorova M. (2018) Apellyatsionnyy organ Vsemirnoy torgovoy organizatsii: perspektivy razvitiya [The Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization: perspectives of development]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol.8, no.1, pp.112–121. (In Russian).
Moscow, Shchepkina str., 8
+7 (495) 608-69-59
+7 (495) 608-66-35