CCR №4 (119) 2017
Essentia constitutionis: The Constitution of the Russian Federation in the focus of constitutional theories of the 20th and 21st centuries. Part 1

Abstract.
The Constitution as a phenomenon is studied not only in the field of jurisprudence, but also in those of history, political science, sociology, philosophy, economic sciences, and other social disciplines. Within jurisprudence, the constitution is the object of constitutional law, and in this framework a constitution is treated either dogmatically in strictly legal terns, or theoretically within the framework of constitutional theory. This article presents the most significant theories on the essence of constitutions through the 20th and 21st centuries. Among the surveyed theories are the normative theory, which regards the constitution as the highest norm of positive law, and the theory of integration, in which the constitution is viewed as the legal order of the process of state integration. The theory of the living constitution presupposes that the constitution develops over time and adapts to new circumstances without being formally changed. According to the axiological theory, the constitution is a system and a hierarchy of values. The liberal theory of defines a constitution as aiming to restrain power and guarantee human freedom. The theory of constitutional fear declares that constitutions appear as a result of previous fears that existed in society and are intended to release citizens from them by putting these fears to rest. The ontological theory of the constitution analyzes the correlation between the constitution and reality, and tries to answer the question of the relationship between constitutional norms and constitutional practices. The theory of constitutional ideals presupposes that the constitution embodies a certain ideal of the state, meaning an ideal state structure according to the standpoint of the authors of the constitution. The author leads the reader through this historical and theoretical maze in order to reflect on the impact that the abovementioned theories had on shaping the text, spirit, meaning, and practice of the existing Russian Constitution.

About the author
Dmitry Shustrov – Candidate of Sciences (Ph.D.) in Law; AssociateProfessor, Department of Constitutional and Municipal Law, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.

Citation:
Shustrov D. (2017) Essentia constitutionis: Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii v fokuse teoriy konstitutsii XX–XXI vekov. Chast’ 1 [Essentia constitutionis: The Constitution of the Russian Federation in the focus of constitutional theories of the 20th and 21st centuries. Part 1]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, no.4, pp.124–141. (In Russian).

References

Aleksi R. (2010) Formula vesa [Alexy R. Weight formula]. Rossiyskiy ezhegodnik teorii prava, no.3, pp.208–228. (In Russian).

Alexy R. (2010) A theory of constitutional rights, Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

Avak’yan S.A. (2000) Konstitutsiya Rossii: priroda, evolyutsiya, sovremennost’ [The Constitution of Russia: Nature, Evolution, Modernity], 2nd ed., Moscow: RYUID “Sashko”. (In Russian).

Barberis M. (2011) Diritto e morale: la discussione odierna. Revus, no.16, pp.55–93.

Barberis M. (2015) Le néoconstitutionnalisme existe-t-il? Revus, no.25, pp.101–124.

Beard Ch.A. (1936) The living constitution. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol.185, no.1, pp.29–34.

Beck J.M. (1930) The Changed Conception of the Constitution. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, vol.69, no.1, pp.99–115.

Bogdanova N.A., Shustrov D.G. (coll.) (2012) Khrestomatiya po konstitutsionnomu pravu. T.I: Istoriya, teoriya i metodologiya konstitutsionnogo prava. Ucheniye o konstitutsii [The Reader in Constitutional Law: In 3 vols. Vol.I: History, Theory and Methodology of Constitutional Law. The doctrine of the constitution], Saint Petersburg: Alef-Press. (In Russian).

Carbonell M. (ed.) (2005) Neoconstitucionalismo(s), 2nd ed., Madrid: Trotta Editorial.

Carbonell M. (ed.) (2007) Teoria del neoconstitucionalismo: Ensayos escogidos, Madrid: Trotta Editorial.

Carbonell M., Jaramillo L.G. (eds.) (2010) El canon neoconstitucional, Madrid: Trotta Editorial.

Comanducci P. (2002) Forme di neocostituzionalismo: una ricognizione metateorica: Neocostituzionalismo e tutela (sovra)nazionale dei diritti fondamentali, T.Mazzarese (ed.), Torino: Giappichelli.

Comanducci P. (2007) Constitución y teoría del derecho, México: Fontamara.

Corwin E.S. (1934) Moratorium over Minnesota. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, vol.82, no.4, pp.311–316.

Detjen J. (2009) Die Werteordnung des Grundgesetzes, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, GWV Fachverlage GmbH.

Dürig G. (1952) Die Menschenauffassung des Grundgesetzes. Juristische Rundschau, no.7, pp.259–263.

Dworkin R. (1996) Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution, Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

Dworkin R. (1996) The Moral Reading of the Constitution. The New York Review of Books, March 21, vol.43, no.5.

Ehrlich E. (1911) Die Erforschung des lebenden Rechts. Schmollers Jahrbuch für Gesetzgebung, Verwaltung und Volkswirtschaft im Deutschen Reich, vol.35, pp.129–147.

Erlikh O. (2011) Osnovopolozhenie sotsiologii prava [Foundations of the sociology of law], Saint Petersburg: OOO “Universitetskiy izdatel‘skiy konsortsium”. (In Russian).

Friedrich C.J. (1937) Constitutional government and politics: Nature and development, New York; London: Harper & Brothers Publishers.

Hagan H.H. (1934) The elasticity of the Federal Constitution. Virginia Law Review, vol.20, no.4, pp.391–401.

Hensel A. (1931) Grundrechte und politische Weltanschauung, Tübingen: Mohr.

Izenzeye Y., Kirkhkhof P. (eds.) (1994) Gosudarstvennoye pravo Germanii [Isensee J., Kirchhof P. (eds.) The State Law of Germany], in 2 vols., Moscow: Institute of State and Law, RAS. (In Russian).

Kant I. (1965) Sochineniya [Works], in 6 vols., Moscow: Mysl’. (In Russian).

Karapetov A.G. (2010) Politika i dogmatika grazhdanskogo prava: istoricheskiy ocherk [Politics and dogmatics of civil law: a historical essay]. Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii, no.4, pp.6–69. (In Russian).

Kel’zen G. (2006) Sudebnaya garantiya konstitutsii (konstitutsionnaya yustitsiya). Chast’ 1 [Judicial guarantee of the Constitution (constitutional justice). Part 1]. Pravo i politika, no.8, pp.5–14. (In Russian).

Kel’zen G. (2006) Sudebnaya garantiya konstitutsii (konstitutsionnaya yustitsiya). Chast’ 2 [Judicial guarantee of the Constitution (constitutional justice). Part 2]. Pravo i politika, no.9, pp.5–18. (In Russian).

Kel’zen G. (2012) Sudebnyy kontrol’ zakonodatel’stva: sravnitel’noe issledovanie avstriyskoy i amerikanskoy konstitutsiy [Judicial control of legislation: a comparative study of the Austrian and American constitutions]. Pravovedeniye, no.2, pp.190–202.

Kel’zen G. (2015) Chistoe uchenie o prave [Pure theory of law], 2nd ed., Saint Petersburg: Alef-Press. (In Russian).

Kel’zen G. (2015) Gans Kel’zen: Chistoe uchenie o prave, spravedlivost’ i estestvennoe parvo [Hans Kelsen: Pure theory of law, justice and natural law], Saint Petersburg: Alef-Press. (In Russian).

Kenenova I.P., Troitskaya A.A., Shustrov D.G. (2015) Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe pravo v doktrine i sudebnykh resheniyakh [Comparative constitutional law in the doctrine and judgments], Moscow: URSS, KRASAND. (In Russian).

Khesse K. (1981) Osnovy konstitutsionnogo prava FRG [Hesse K. Fundamentals of the constitutional law of the Federal Republic of Germany], Moscow: Yurid. lit. (In Russian).

Llewellyn K.N. (1934) The Constitution as an institution. Columbia Law Review, vol.34, no.1, pp.1–40.

Loewenstein K. (1965) Political power and the governmental process, 2nd ed., Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

McBain H.L. (1927) The living constitution: A consideration of the realities and legends of our fundamental law, New York: The Macmillan Company.

Pestritto R.J. (ed.) (2005) Woodrow Wilson: The essential political writings, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

Pound R. (1910) Law in books and law in action. American Law Review, vol.44, pp.12–36.

Pozzolo S. (1998) Neoconstitucionalismo y especifidad de la interpretación constitucional. Doxa, no.21, pp.339–353.

Rehnquist W.H. (2006) The notion of a living constitution. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, vol.29, no.2, pp.401–415.

Schmitt C. (2008) Constitutional theory, Durham: Duke University Press.

Shayo A. (1999) Samoogranichenie vlasti (kratkiy kurs konstitutsionalizma) [Self-limitation of power (short course of constitutionalism)], Moscow: Yurist. (In Russian).

Shmitt K. (2013) Gosudarstvo: pravo i politika [State: Law and Politics], Moscow: Territoriya budushchego. (In Russian).

Shustrov D. (2017) Essentia constitutionis: Konstitutsiya Rossiyskoy Federa­tsii – vzglyad cherez veka konstitutsionnoy teorii [Essentia constitutionis: Constitution of the Russian Federation – a look through the centuries of constitutional theory]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, no.3, pp.71–90. (In Russian).

Shustrov D.G. (2012) Konstitutsionnyy inzhiniring gosudarstva [Constitutional engineering of the state]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, no.5, pp.13–33. (In Russian).

Shustrov D.G. (2013) Ierarkhiya konstitutsionnykh tsennostey [Hierarchy of constitutional values]. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal’noe pravo, no.6, pp.6–15. (In Russian).

Shustrov D.G. (2015) Aksiologiya Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii 1993 goda [Axiology of the 1993 Constitution of the Russian Federation]. Sotsial’no-politicheskie nauki, no.4, pp.14–26. (In Russian).

Shustrov D.G. (2017) Sushchnost’ konstitutsii: osnovnye teorii [The essence of the constitution: the basic theory], Moscow: Yurlitinform. (In Russian).

Shustrov D.G. (2015) Printsip proportsional’nosti v konstitutsionnom prave Izrailya: Monografiya [The principle of proportionality in the constitutional law of Israel: Monograph], Moscow: URSS, LENAND. (In Russian).

Smend R. (1968) Verfassung und Verfassungsrecht. In: Smend R. Staatsrechtliche Abhandlungen und andere Aufsätze, 2nd ed., Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp.179 f.

Smend R. (2000) Constitution and Constitutional Law. In: Jacobson A.J., Schlink B. (ed.) Weimar: a jurisprudence of crisis, Berkeley; Los Angeles; London: University of California Press, pp.213–248.

Strauss D.A. (2010) The living constitution, New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wiederin E. (2011) Die Stufenbaulehre Adolf Julius Merkls. In: Griller S., Rill H.P. (eds.) Rechtstheorie: Rechtsbegriff – Dynamik – Auslegung, Wien; NewYork: Springer, pp.81–134.

Wilson W. (1908) Constitutional Government in the United States, New York: Columbia University Press.

Zavadskiy A.V. (1916) K ucheniyu o tolkovanii grazhdanskikh zakonov: Noveyshie techeniya po etomu voprosu v nemetskoy literature (shkola svobodnogo prava i dr.) [To the doctrine of the interpretation of civil laws: The newest trends on this issue in German literature (the school of free law, etc.)], Kazan’: Tipo-lit. Imp. un-ta. (In Russian).

Zor’kin V. (2008) Aksiologicheskie aspekty Konstitutsii Rossii [Axiological aspects of the Constitution of Russia]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, no.4, pp.7–20. (In Russian).

Zor’kin V.D. (2008) Rossiya i Konstitutsiya v XXI veke [Russia and the Constitution in the 21st Century], Moscow: Norma. (In Russian).

Zor’kin V.D., Lazarev L.V. (ed.) (2009) Kommentariy k Konstitutsii Rossiy­skoy Federatsii [Commentary on the Constitution of the Russian Federation], Moscow: Eksmo. (In Russian).

Issue articles