IJ №3 (19) 2016
Enforcement of Annulled Foreign Arbitral Awards: Welcome Development or Pathway to Uncertainty?Enforcement of Annulled Foreign Arbitral Awards: Welcome Development or Pathway to Uncertainty?

Abstract
One of the most debatable topics in the field of the development of international commercial arbitration is the legal status of the vacated foreign arbitral awards and the possibility of their enforcement abroad. This problem is relevant both when defining a common doctrinal approach, and while ensuring the uniformity of global judicial practice, including in case of international economic disputes. Nowadays the dispute between the members of international arbitration community as to the enforceability of foreign arbitral awards set aside in the country of origin is far from being settled. There are several key aspects, regarding which a consensus is so elusive. Firstly, it is a matter of interpretation of generally accepted international conventions, aimed at the proliferation of international commercial arbitration as the all-purpose, independent and effective way of dispute resolution, but also at the protection of the interests of each participant to the arbitration process, regardless of the country where a foreign award is enforced by local courts. Secondly, it is a need to preserve a high degree of autonomy of the actors of international commercial arbitration from the requirements of the national law, the permissibility of coexistence of several diametrically opposed decisions in the same case in different jurisdictions, and, finally, the finality and extraterritoriality of arbitral awards.

About the author
Anna Matveeva – LL.M. (University of Edinburgh, Commercial Law), legal consultant at JSC “Western High-Speed Diametr”.

Citation 
Matveeva A. (2016) Ispolnenie otmenennykh resheniy inostrannykh arbit­razhnykh sudov: dolgozhdannoe novovvedenie ili put’ k neopredelennosti? [Enforcement of annulled foreign arbitral awards: welcome development or pathway to uncertainty?]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, no.3, pp.18–36. (In Russian).

References:

Blackaby N., Partasides C., Redfern A., Hunter M. (2009) Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration, 5th ed., Oxon; New York: Oxford University Press.

Born G. (2009) International Commercial Arbitration, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.

Carbonneau T. (2003) The Exercise of Contract Freedom in the Making of Arbitration Agreements. Vanderbilt University Journal of Transnational Law, vol.36, no.4, pp.1189–1232.

Chan R.Y. (1999) The Enforceability of Annulled Foreign Arbitral Awards in the United States: A Critique of Chromalloy. Boston University International Law Journal, vol.17, no.1, pp.141–214.

Davis K. (2002) Unconventional Wisdom: A New Look at Articles V and VII of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. Texas International Law Journal, vol.37, no.1, pp.43–87.

Delaume G.R. (1997) Enforcement Against a Foreign State of an Arbitral Award Annulled in the Foreign State. International Business Law Journal, no.2. pp.253–254.

Derains Y. (1978) Foreword. In: Glossner O., et al. Hommage à Frédéric Eisemann, Paris: Chambre de commerce internationale.

Drahozal Ch. (2000) Enforcing Vacated International Arbitral Awards: An Economic Approach. American Review of International Arbitration, vol.11, no.4, pp.451–479.

Freyer D. (2000) United States Recognition and Enforcement of Annulled Foreign Arbitral Awards: The Aftermath of the Chromalloy Case. Journal of International Arbitration, vol.17, no.2, pp.1–9.

Gadel’shina E.P. (2012) Problemy priznaniya otmenennykh resheniy mezhdunarodnykh arbitrazhnykh sudov: Delo Ciments Francais kak primer rossiyskoy sudebnoy praktiki [Problems of enforcement of vacated international arbitral decisions: The Ciments Francais case as an example of Russian court practice]. Zakon, no.4, pp.106–109. (In Russian).

Gaillard E. (1999) Enforcement of Awards Set Aside in the Country of Origin: The French Experience. In: Van den Berg A.J. (ed.) Improving the Efficiency of Arbitration Agreements and Awards: 40 Years of Application of the New York Convention, The Hague; Boston: Kluwer Law International, pp.505–527.

Gaillard E., Savage J. (1999) Fouchard Gaillard Goldman on International Arbitration, The Hague; Boston: Kluwer Law International.

Gaillard E., Edelstein J. (2000) Baker Marine and Spier Strike a Blow to the Enforceability in the United States of Awards Set Aside at the Seat. International Arbitration Law Review, vol.3, no.2, pp.37–43.

Gharavi H. (1996) Enforcing Set Aside Arbitral Awards: France’s Controversial Steps Beyond the New York Convention. Journal of Transnational Law & Policy, vol.6, no.1, pp.93–107.

Glossner O. (1984) Commercial Arbitration in the Federal Republic of Germany, Deventer, The Netherlands: Boston: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers.

Goode R. (2001) The Role of the Lex Loci Arbitri in International Commercial Arbitration. Arbitration International, vol.17, no.1, pp.19–40.

Hulbert R.W. (2009) When the Theory Doesn’t Fit the Facts. A Further Comment on Putrabali. Arbitration International, vol.25, no.2, pp.157–172.

Kendra Th. (2012) The International Reach of Arbitral Awards Set Aside in Their Country of Origin: a Turning Point? International Business Law Journal, no.1, рp.35–52.

Kitova E. Yuristy otsenili reshenie suda Gaagi po delu YUKOSa [Attorneys at las have estimated the decision of the Court of The Hague in the Yukos case]. Available at: http://pravo.ru/news/view/128377/ (accecced: 12.07.2016). (In Russian).

Koch Ch. (2009) The Enforcement of Awards Annulled in their Place of Origin – The French and U.S. Experience. Journal of International Arbitration, vol.26, no.2, pp.267–292.

Kudelich E.A. (2015) Transgranichnoe ispolnenie sudebnykh resheniy v Rossii: v plenu ustoyavshikhsya stereotipov ili postupatel’noe dvizhenie vpered? [Transborder execution of the decisions set aside: in the trap of stereotypes or an onward development?]. Zakon, no.5, pp.143–157. (In Russian).

Kurochkin S.A. (2013) Narushenie publichnogo poryadka Rossiyskoy Fede­ratsii kak osnovanie dlya otkaza v priznanii i privedenii v ispolnenie ino­strannykh sudebnykh i arbitrazhnykh resheniy [Violation of public policy of the Russian Federation as a basis for refusing recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments and arbitral awards]. Zakon, no.4, pp.39–46. (In Russian).

Lamm C.B. (2009) Comments on the Proposal to Amend the New York Convention. In: Van den Berg A.J. (ed.) 50 Years of the New York Conventiom: ICCA International Arbitration Conference, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.

Lastenouse P. (1999) Why Setting Aside an Arbitral Award is not Enough to Remove it from the International Scene. Journal of International Arbitration, vol.16, no.2, pp.25–47.

Litvinskiy D. (2014) Maksimov protiv NLMK: proigral v Rossii, vyigral vo Frantsii [Maximov v. NLMK: lost in Russia, won in France]. Zakon.ru, 15 April. Available at: https://zakon.ru/blog/2014/4/15/maksimov_protiv_nlmk_proigral_v_rossii_vyigral_vo_francii (accecced: 15.06.2016). (In Russian).

Ma W. (2009) Harmonising Judicial Approaches to Determining the Enforceability of Foreign Annulled Awards. Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, vol.2, no.2, pp.247–300.

Mayer P. (2001) Revisiting Hilmarton and Chromalloy. In: Van den Berg A.J. (ed.) International Arbitration and National Courts: The Never Ending Story, The Hague; New York: Kluwer Law International, pp.165–176.

Mayer U.C. (1998) The Enforcement of Annulled Arbitral Awards: Towards a Uniform Judicial Interpretation of the New York Convention. Uniform Law Review, vol.3, no.2–3, pp.583–599.

Minina A.I. (2014) Mezhdunarodnyy kommercheskiy arbitrazh: peresmotr resheniy [International commercial arbitration: revision of decisions]. Aktual’nye problemy rossiyskogo prava, no.3, pp.499–506. (In Russian).

Neuhaus J.E. (2004–2005) Current Issues in the Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards. University of Miami Inter-American Law Review, vol.36, no.1, pp.23–39.

Ostrowski S., Shany Y. (1998) Chromalloy: United States Law and International Arbitration at the Crossroads. New York University Law Review, vol.73, no.5, pp.1650–1693.

Park W. (1999) Duty and Discretion in International Arbitration. American Journal of International Law, vol.93, no.4, pp.805–823.

Paulsson J. (1997) Rediscovering the N.Y. Convention: Further Reflections on Chromalloy. Mealey’s International Arbitration Report, vol.12, no.4, pp.20–29.

Paulsson J. (1998) Enforcing Arbitral Awards Notwithstanding Local Standard Annulments. Asia Pacific Law Review, vol.6, no.2, pp.1–28.

Paulsson J. (1998) May or Must Under the New York Convention: An Exercise in Syntax and Linguistics. Arbitration International, vol.14, no.2, pp.227–230.

Paulsson J. (1999) Towards Minimum Standards of Enforcement: Feasibility of a Model Law. In: Van den Berg A.J. (ed.) Improving the Efficiency of Arbitration Agreements and Awards: 40 Years of Application of the New York Convention, The Hague; Boston: Kluwer Arbitration, pp.574–582.

Pavlova N.V. (2013) Ogovorka o publichnom poryadke kak sudebnyy eks­klyuziv i predel vezhlivosti konkretnoy natsii: Kommentariy k Obzoru praktiki rassmotreniya arbitrazhnymi sudami del o primenenii ogovorki o publichnom poryadke [The public policy clause as a judicial exception and a limit of politeness of a particular nation: Commentary on the Review of practice of consideration by courts of arbitration cases on the application of the public policy clause]. Vestnik Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossiy­skoy Federatsii, no.7, pp.162–173. (In Russian).

Pinsolle Ph. (2008) The Status of vacated Awards in France: The Cour de Cassation Decision in Putrabali. Arbitration International, vol.24, no.2, pp.277–296.

Plekhanov V.V., Usoskin S.V. (2012) Avtonomiya mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazha: k voprosu o koordinatsii mezhdu razlichnymi yurisdiktsiyami v protsesse priznaniya i privedeniya v ispolnenie resheniy mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazha [The autonomy of international commercial arbitration: the question of coordination between the various jurisdictions in the process of recognition and enforcement of international commercial arbitration decisions]. Vestnik mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazha, no.1, pp.31–60. (In Russian).

Polkinghorne M. (2008) Enforcement of Annulled Awards in France: Sting in the Tail. International Construction Law Review, vol.25, no.1, pp.48–56.

Poudret J., Besson S. (2007) Comparative Law of International Arbitration, London: Sweet&Maxwell.

Ramaswamy P. (2002) Enforcement of Annulled Awards: An Indian Perspective. Journal of International Arbitration, vol.19, no.5, pp.461–472.

Reisman W.M. (1992) Systems of Control in International Adjudication and Arbitration, Durham: Duke University Press.

Rivkin D. (1999) The Enforcement of Awards Nullified in the Country of Origin: The American Experience. In: Van den Berg A.J. (ed.) Improving the Efficiency of Arbitration Agreements and Awards: 40 Years of Application of the New York Convention, The Hague ; Boston: Kluwer Law International, pp.528–543.

Sachs K. (1999) The Enforcement of Awards Nullified in the Country of Origin: The German Perspective. In: Van den Berg A.J. (ed.) Improving the Efficiency of Arbitration Agreements and Awards: 40 Years of Application of the New York Convention, The Hague; Boston: Kluwer Law International, pp.552–556.

Sampliner G.H. (1996) Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards After Annulment in Their Country of Origin. Mealey’s International Arbitration Report, vol.11, no.9, pp.22–34.

Sampliner G.H. (1997) Enforcement of Nullified Foreign Arbitral Awards: Chromalloy Revisited. Journal of International Arbitration, vol.14, no.3, pp.141–165.

Sandrock O. (1998) Procedural Aspects of the New German Act. Arbitration International, vol.14, no.1, pp.33–46.

Schwartz E.A. (1997) A Comment on Chromalloy: Hilmarton, a l’americaine. Journal of International Arbitration, vol.14, no.2, pp.125–135.

Schwartz E.A. (1997) French Supreme Court Renders Final Judgment in the Hilmarton Case. International Arbitration Law Review, vol.1, no.1, pp.45–47.

Slater M.D. (2009) On Annulled Awards and the Death of Chromalloy. Arbitration International, vol.25, no.2, pp.271–292.

Smith E. (2002) Vacated Arbitral Awards: Recognition and Enforcement Outside the Country of Origin. Boston University International Law Journal, vol.20, no.2, pp.355–392.

Tkachev I. (2016) Gaagskiy sud otmenil reshenie o vyplate $50 mlrd aktsioneram YKOSa [The Court in Hague abolished the decision to compensate 50 bln USD to shareholders of YUKOS]. Available at: http://www.rbc.ru/economics/20/04/2016/5716c58e9a79472cc55ecc0e?from=main (accecced 21.06.2016). (In Russian).

Tkachev I. (2016) Pyat’ voprosov o 50$ mlrd [Five questions about 50$ bln]. URL: http://www.rbc.ru/newspaper/2016/04/21/571735729a79477c33cbea58 (accecced: 12.07.2016). (In Russian).

Tweeddale A., Tweeddale K. (2007) Arbitration of Commercial Disputes. International and English Law and Practice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Usoskin S. (2016) Rossiya dobilas’ otmeny resheniy po delu YUKOSa svyazkoy udarov iz mezhdunarodnogo i natsional’nogo prava [Russia successfully managed to set aside the decision in Yukos case with a bunch of punches from international and national law]. Available at: http://zakon.ru/blog/2016/4/20/rossiya_dobilas_otmeny_reshenij_po_delu_yukosa_svyazkoj_udarov_iz_mezhdunarodnogo_i_nacionalnogo_pra?AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1 (accecced: 11.07.2016). (In Russian).

Van den Berg A.J. (1981) The New York Arbitration Convention of 1958: Towards a Uniform Judicial Interpretation, Deventer, The Netherlands; Boston: Kluwer Law and Taxation.

Van den Berg A.J. (1994) Annulment of Awards in International Arbitration. In: Lillich R.B., Brower Ch.N. (eds.) International Arbitration in the 21st Century: Towards “Judicialization” and Uniformity? Irvington, NY: Transnational Publishers, pp.133–162.

Van den Berg A.J. (1994) Court Decisions on the New York Convention 1958. Yearbook Commercial Arbitration, vol.XIX, pp.467–849.

Van den Berg A.J. (1998) Enforcement of Annulled Awards? ICC International Court Arbitration Bulletin, vol.9, no.2, pp.15–21.

Van den Berg A.J. (1999) Refusals of Enforcement under the New York Convention of 1958: The Unfortunate Few. The ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin, (Special Supp.), vol.10, рр.75–94.

Van den Berg A.J. (2003) Set aside. Yearbook Commercial Arbitration, vol.XXVIII, pp.661–670.

Van den Berg A.J. (2007) New York Convention of 1958: Refusals of Enforcement. The ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin, vol.18, no.2, pp.15–49.

Van den Berg A.J. (2008) The New York Convention of 1958: An Overview. In: Gaillard E., Di Pietro D. (eds.) Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements and International Arbitral Awards: The New York Convention in Practice, London: Cameron May, pp.39–68.

Van den Berg A.J. (2010) Enforcement of Arbitral Awards Annulled in Russia: Case Comment on Court of Appeal of Amsterdam, April 28, 2009. Journal of International Arbitration, vol.27, no.2, рp.179–198.

Van den Berg A.J. (2011) Enforcement of Arbitral Awards Annulled in Russia: Case Comment on Dutch Supreme Court of 25 June 2010. Journal of International Arbitration, vol.28, no.6, рp.617–641.

Wahl Ph. (1999) Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards Set Aside in their Country of Origin: The Chromalloy Case Revisited. Journal of International Arbitration, vol.16, no.4, pp.131–140.

Weinacht F. (2002) Enforcement of Annulled Foreign Arbitral Awards in Germany. Journal of International Arbitration, vol.19, no.4, pp.313–336.

Issue articles