CCR №4(131) 2019
On a heuristic viewpoint concerning the similarity of direct constitutional and administrative judicial compliance assessment

The full text of the article is available only in Russian.

Abstract

As a result of the unified essence of regulatory affairs as a logical operation for comparing the meaning of several normative legal acts, disagreements have yet to cease about whether it is possible to realize normal and constitutional direct regulation according to unified rules for administrative legal proceedings. There is a difference of the subject of legal action within the framework of the named types of direct regulation that are mainly seen in the method with the help of which they are realized. These differences define the main legal-procedural characteristics of direct constitutional regulation, among which is (1) the need to consider a case by the court in a wide collegial bench of judges that are equal to each other, (2) the subsidiary character of constitutional legal proceedings for this category of cases, and (3) the need to appeal the decision of the court. These create specific characteristics for legal proceedings for constitutional justice, specifically: the need to introduce special requirements for candidates for judgeships and guarantees for the status of judges presiding in constitutional legal proceedings, and empowering the court apparatus with quasi-judicial functions. These differences in the subject of legal action prove that there are no dogmatic, political, or legal grounds for conclusions regarding the principal similarities between constitutional and general direct regulation and on the possibility for general jurisdiction courts to perform constitutional regulation.

The full text of the article is available only in Russian.

About the author:
Anton Ilin – Doctor of Sciences (Ph.D.) in Law, Professor, Higher School of Economics, Saint Petersburg, Russia

Citation: Ilin A. (2019) Ob odnoy evristicheskoy tochke zreniya, kasayushcheysya skhodstva pryamogo konstitutsionnogo i administrativnogo sudebnogo normokontrolya [On a heuristic viewpoint concerning the similarity of direct constitutional and administrative judicial compliance assessment]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.28, no.4, pp.35–55. (In Russian).

References:

Akhtenberg N., Badura P., Bekenferde E.V., Gek V.K., Glezer V.Sh., Gertsog R., Izenzee J., Kiminnikh O., Klyain G., Kunig F., Lever V., Maner G., Relleke G., Kheberle L., Khenke V., Tsakher Kh.V., Tsee V., Shlaikh K., Shmidt-Asman E., Shreder M. (1994) Gosudarstvennoe pravo Germanii [German state law], vol.1, Moscow: Institut gosudarstva i prava Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. (In Russian).

Bek O.A. (2007) Proizvodstvo po delam ob osparivanii normativnykh pravovykh aktov: Avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Production on cases of contestation of normative legal acts: Abstract of a dissertation… candidate of legal science], Moscow. (In Russian).

Blokhin P.D. (2015) Rol’ apparata organov konstitutsionnoy yustitsii v sudebnom protsesse: sravnitel’no-pravovoy analiz: Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. [Role of the office of the constitutional justice in trial: comparative and legal analysis: Cand. of law sci. dis.], Moscow. (In Russian).

Bondar’ N.S. (2016) Sudebnyy konstitutsionalizm: doktrina i praktika [Judicial constitutionalism: doctrine and practice], Moscow: Norma: Infra-M. (In Russian).

Cardozo B.N. (2017) Priroda sudebnoy deyatel’nosti [The Nature of the Judicial Process], Moscow: Statut. (In Russian).

Dolzhikov A. (2018) Stakan napolovinu polon ili pust? Vmeshatel’stvo kak forma ogranicheniya konstitutsionnykh prav [Is the glass half-empty or half-full? Interference as a form of constitutional rights’ limitation]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.27, no.1, pp.80–112. (In Russian).

Gadzhiev G.A. (2013) Ontologiya prava (kriticheskoe issledovanie yuridi­cheskogo kontsepta deystvitel’nosti) [Ontology of law (critical study of the legal concept of reality)], Мoscow: Norma: Infra-M. (In Russian).

Garapon A. (1996) Le gardien des promesses justice еt democratie, Paris: Odile Jacob. (In French). (Russian ed.: Garapon A. (2004) Khranitel’ obeshchaniy: sud i demokratiya, G.V.Churshukov (transl.), P.Riker (ed.), Moscow: Nota Bene Media Treyd Kompaniya.) (In Russian).

Gordon V.M. (1906) Iski o priznanii [Claims for recognition], Yaroslavl: Tipografiya Gubernskogo pravleniya. (In Russian).

Gurvich M.A. (1949) Pravo na isk [Right to sue], Moscow, Leningrag: Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR. (In Russian).

Gegel’ G.W.F. (1807) Kto myslit abstraktno? [Who thinks abstractly]. In: Gulyga A.V. (ed.) (1970) Raboty raznykh let [Writings of different years], vol.1, Moscow: Institut filosofii Akademii nauk SSSR; Mysl’. (In Russian).

Ilin A.V. (2011) Razreshenie sudami sporov, voznikayushchikh po povodu raspredeleniya byudzhetnykh sredstv [Resolution courts disputes regarding budget allocation], Moscow, Berlin: Infotropik Media. (In Russian).

Ilin A.V. (2017) Konstitutsionnye osnovaniya osushchestvleniya normokontrolya v grazhdanskom protsesse i predmet sudebnoy deyatel’nosti [Constitutional bases of implementation of compliance assessment in civil procedure and the subject of judicial activity]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa, no.2, pp.31–46. (In Russian).

Karapetov A.G. (2011) Bor’ba za priznanie sudebnogo pravotvorchestva v evropeyskom i amerikanskom prave [Fight for recognition of judicial law-making in European and American law], Moscow: Statut. (In Russian).

Kokotov A.N. (2014) Pravo konstitutsii v rossiyskom prave [Law of the constitution in the Russian law]. Aktual’nye problemy rossiyskogo prava, no.10, pp.2161–2168. (In Russian).

Marokko N.A. (2008) Opredelenie kriteriev dopustimosti zhaloby v Konstitutsionnyy Sud RF na narushenie konstitutsionnykh prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina [Determination of the criteria for admissibility of a complaint to the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation on violation of constitutional rights and freedoms of a person and citizen]. Sovremennoe pravo, no.6, pp.23–28. (In Russian).

Opalev R.O., Solov’ev A.A. (2017) Administrativnaya yustitsiya v zarubezhnykh gosudarstvakh: osobennosti funktsionirovaniya otdel’nykh institutov administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva [Administrative justice in the foreign states: features of functioning of separate institutes of administrative legal proceedings: monograph], Moscow: Moskovskiy gosudarstvennyy yuridicheskiy universitet imeni O.E.Kutafina (MGYuA). (In Russian).

Prokudina L.A. (2009) Institut pomoshchnika sud’i (sovremennyy status) [Institute of judge assistant (contemporary status)]. Yuridicheskiy mir, no.10, pp.43–47. (In Russian).

Sivitskiy V.A. (2012) O nekotorykh aspektakh rassmotreniya obrashcheniy v adres Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii v predvaritel’nom poryadke ego Sekretariatom [On some aspects of the consideration of appeals to the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in a preliminary order by its Secretariat]. Zhurnal konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya, no.1, pp.23–28. (In Russian).

Sorokopud A.V. (2018) Pomoshchnik sud’i v rossiyskom grazhdanskom (arbitrazhnom) protsesse: problemy formirovaniya pravovogo statusa [An Assistant Judge in the Russian Civil (Arbitration) Procedure: Legal Status Establishment Issues]. Arbitrazhnyy i grazhdanskiy protsess, no.5, pp.47–53. (In Russian).

Vas’kovskiy E.V. (2016) Kurs grazhdanskogo protsessa: Sub’ekty i ob’ekty protsessa, protsessual’nye otnosheniya i deystviya [The course of the civil process: The subjects and objects of the process, procedural relations and actions], Moscow: Statut. (In Russian).

Zor’kin V.D. (2015) Tsivilizatsiya prava i razvitie Rossii [Civilization of law and development of Russia], Moscow: Norma: Infra-M. (In Russian).

Issue articles