CCR №1 (140) 2021
Supra-constitutional norms in constitutional law

The full text of the article is available only in Russian.

Abstract

The idea of supra-constitutionality was formulated in the science of constitutional law in the second quarter of the 20th century and associated with the names of M.Hauriou and K.Schmitt, who for the first time noticed the possibility of the existence of norms that are higher than the constitution. This article is an attempt to give the doctrine of supra-constitutionality an actual theoretical and dogmatic meaning in the context of the study of the material limits of constitutional changes. The doctrine of supra-constitutionality claims to play an important role in explaining that unchangeable norms can exist in constitutional law and that they cannot be excluded, changed, limited, overcome, affected by the other sources of constitutional law, including the constitution itself. Supra-constitutionality is viewed as a characteristic of unchangeable constitutional norms that constitute the material limits of constitutional changes. Supra-constitutionality presupposes the existence of norms that surpass the rest of the constitutional norms and predetermine their content through the definition of what can, should and should not be included in the constitution or excluded from it. The basis of constitutional supra-constitutionality is the argument of hierarchical differentiation. In addition to recognizing unchangeable constitutional norms as supra-constitutional, the article raises the question of the existence of natural law and international law supra-constitutional norms. Natural law supra-constitutional norms have an external and non-positive character. They are not enshrined in the constitution, but stem from a reasonably understood concept of what is due in the most civilized societies, which is determined by the constitutional court. International law supra-constitutionality is understood as the superiority of the norms of international law over the constitution. It has an external and positive character. International law supra-constitutionality can cause political objections from opponents of the absolute rule of international law. Supra-constitutional constitutional, natural and international law norms can come into conflict with each other. The paradox of the doctrine of supra-constitutionality lies in the fact that it creates a hierarchy of norms within the constitution itself, distinguishing between simple and supra-constitutional constitutional norms, or distinguishes certain non-positive norms that are outside the constitution, as having priority over the constitution, or puts some norms of international law over all norms of national law, including the constitution. The purpose of the doctrine of supra-constitutionality is to preserve the inviolable fundamental (natural or generally recognized) values, which justifies its logical flaws and paradoxicality.

About the author:
Dmitry Shustrov — Candidate of Sciences (Ph.D.) in Law; Associate Professor, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

Citation: Shustrov D. (2021) Nadkonstitutsionnye normy v konstitutsionnom prave [Supra-constitutional norms in constitutional law]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.30, no.1, pp.100–127. (In Russian).

References

Adamovich L.K., Funk B.-C., Holzinger G., Frank S.L. (2011) Österreichisches Staatsrecht. Bd.1: Grundlagen, 2nd ed., Wien; New York: Springer.

Alebastrova I.A. (2007) Konstitutsionnye printsipy: problemy yuridicheskoy prirody i effektivnosti realizatsii [Constitutional principles: problems of the legal nature and efficiency of implementation]. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal’noe pravo, no.7, pp.5–12. (In Russian).

Alexy R. (2010) A Theory of Constitutional Rights, J.Rivers (transl.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Baranger D. (2011) The Language of Eternity: Judicial Review of the Amending Power in France (or the Absence Thereof). Israel Law Review, vol.44, no.3, pp.389–428.

Belov M. (ed.) (2018) Global Constitutionalism and Its Challenges to Westphalian Constitutional Law, London: Hart Publishing.

Berka W. (2012) Verfassungsrecht. Grundzüge des österreichischen Verfassungsrechts für das juristische Studium: lehrbuch, 4th ed., Wien; New York: Springer.

Blankenagel A. (2018) “Prizrak brodit po resheniyam evropeyskikh konstitutsionnykh sudov”: chto delat’ s konstitutsionnoy identichnost’yu? [“The ghost haunting decisions of European constitutional courts”: what to do with constitutional identity?]. Stavnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.27, no.5, pp.42–64. (In Russian).

Böckenförde E.-W. (2017) The Constituent Power of the People: A Liminal Concept of Constitutional Law. In: BöckenfördeE.-W. Constitutional and Political Theory: Selected Writings. Vol.1, M.Künkler, T.Stein (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.169–185.

Bogdanova N.A. (2004) Nadkonstitutsionnost’ i nadnormativnost’ v sisteme kharakteristik konstitutsii [Superconstitutionality and supra-normativity in the system of constitutional characteristics]. In: Avak’yan S.A. (ed.) Konstitutsiya kak simvol epokhi. T.1 [The Constitution as a symbol of the era. Vol. 1], in 2 vols., Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, pp.42–45. (In Russian).

Casavola F.P. (1995) I principî supremi nella giurisprudenza della Corte costituzionale. Il Foro Italiano, vol.118, no.4, pp.153–161.

De Vattel E. (1960) Pravo narodov, ili printsipy estestvennogo prava, primenyaemye k povede­niyu i delam natsiy i suverenov [Law of peoples or principles of natural law applicable to the behavior and affairs of nations and sovereigns], Moscow: Gosyurizdat. (In Russian).

Dietze G. (1956) Unconstitutional Constitutional Norms? Constitutional Development in Postwar Germany. Virginia Law Review, vol.42, no.1, pp.1–22.

Dixon R., Landau D. (2016) Transnatsional’nyy konstitutsionalism i ogranichennaya doktrina nekonstitutsionnogo izmeneniya konstitutsii [Transnational constitutionalism and a limited doctrine of unconstitutional constitutional amendment]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.25, no.2, pp.32–63. (In Russian).

Dobner P., Loughlin M. (eds.) (2010) The Twilight of Constitutionalism? Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

Doyle M.W. (2009) The UN Charter — A Global Constitution. In: Dunoff J.L., Trachtman J.P. (eds.) Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.113–132.

Dunoff J.L., Trachtman J.P. (2009) A Functional Approach to International Constitutionalization. In: Dunoff J.L., Trachtman J.P. (eds.) Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.3–36.

Dworkin R. (2004) O pravakh vser’ez [Taking rights seriously], L.B.Makeeva (transl.), Moscow: Rossiyskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya. (In Russian).

Fassbender B. (2007) “We the Peoples of the United Nations”: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form in International Law. In: Loughlin M., Walker N. (eds.) The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.269–290.

Fassbender B. (2009) The United Nations Charter as the Constitution of the International Community, Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, BRILL.

Favoreu L. (1993) Souveraineté et supraconstitutionnalité. Pouvoirs: Revue française d’études constitutionnelles et politiques, no.67, pp.71–77.

Franck T. (2003) Is the UN Charter a Constitution? In: Frowein J.A., Scharioth K., Winkelmann I., Wolfrum R. (eds.) Verhandeln für den frieden — Negotiating for Peace: Liber amicorum Tono Eitel, Berlin; Heidelberg; New York: Springer, pp.95–106.

Garlicki L., Garlicka Z.A. (2011) External Review of Constitutional Amendments? International Law as a Norm of Reference. Israel Law Review, vol.44, no.3, pp.343–368.

Grimm D. (1995) Does Europe Need a Constitution? European Law Journal, vol.1, no.3, pp.282–302.

Habermas J. (2008) Nuzhna li Evrope Konstitutsiya? Zamechanie k dokladu Ditera Grimma [Remarks on Dieter Grimm’s “Does Europe need a Constitution?”]. In: Habermas J. Vovlechenie drugogo: Ocherki politicheskoy teorii [Die Einbeziehung des Anderen. Studien zur politischen Theorie], 2nd ed., Saint Petersburg: Nauka, pp.268–276. (In Russian).

Habermas J. (2008) Raskolotyy Zapad [Der gespaltene Westen], E.L.Petrenko, M.M.Belyaev (eds.), E.L.Petrenko, O.I.Velichko (transl.), Moscow: Ves’ mir. (In Russian).

Habermas J. (2008) The Constitutionalization of International Law and the Legitimation Problems of a Constitution for World Society. Constellations, vol.15, no.4, pp.444–455.

Hauriou M. (1923) Précis de droit constitutionnel, Paris: Libraire du Recueil Sirey.

Hauriou M. (1930) Précis élémentaire de droit constitutionnel, 2nd ed., Paris: Libraire du Recueil Sirey.

Kant I. (1963–1966) Sochineniya [Selected works], V.F.Asmus, A.V.Gulyga, T.I.Oyzerman (eds.), B.A.Fokht (transl.), in 6 vols., Moscow: Mysl’. (In Russian).

Kashkin S.Yu., Chetverikova A.O. (eds.) (2010) Evropeyskiy Soyuz: osnovopolagayushchie akty v redaktsii Lissabonskogo dogovora s kommentariyami [European Union: founding acts as amended by the Lisbon Treaty with commentary], Moscow: INFRA-M. (In Russian).

Kelsen H. (1951) The Law of the United Nations: A Critical Analysis of Its Fundamental Problems, 2nd ed., London: Stevens & Sons Limited.

Kelsen H. (2006) Sudebnaya garantiya Konstitutsii (Konstitutsionnaya yustitsiya). Chast’ 2 [Judicial guarantee of the Constitution (Constitutional justice). Part 2]. Pravo i politika, no.9, pp.5–14. (In Russian).

Kelsen H. (2015) Chistoe uchenie o prave [Pure theory of law], 2nd ed., M.V.Antonova, S.V.Lyozova (transl.), Saint Petersburg: Izdatel’skiy dom “Alef-Press”. (In Russian).

Kenenova I.P., Troitskaya A.A., Shustrov D.G. (2015) Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe pravo v doktrine i sudebnykh resheniyakh: uchebnoe posobie [Comparative constitutional law in doctrine and judgments: a textbook], Moscow: URSS, KRASAND. (In Russian).

Klabbers J., Peters A., Ulfstein G. (2009) The Constitutionalization of International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kovler A.I. (2019) Evropeyskaya konventsiya po pravam cheloveka i mezhdunarodnoe gumanitarnoe pravo: o pol’ze demarkatsionnykh liniy [European Convention on human rights and international humanitarian law: on the use of demarcation lines]. Byulleten’ Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka, no.8, pp.146–152. (In Russian).

Krisch N. (2010) Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law, Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

Macdonald R.St.J., Johnston D.M. (2005) Towards World Constitutionalism: Issues in the Legal Ordering of the World Community, Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.

Magnon X. (2004) Quelques maux encore à propos des lois de révision constitutionnelle: limites, contrôle, efficacité, caractère opératoire et existence. Revue française de droit constitutionnel, no.59, pp.595–617.

Medushevsky A. (2020) Global’nyy konstitutsionalism kak pravovaya teoriya i ideologiya pereustroy­stva mirovogo poryadka [Global constitutionalism as a legal theory and ideology of the reorganization of the world order]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.29, no.1, pp.15–42. (In Russian).

Nußberger A. (2019) Evropeyskaya Konventsiya o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod — Konstitutsiya dlya Evropy? [The European Convention for Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms — a Constitution for Europe?]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol.9, no.2, pp.3–19. (In Russian).

Pernice I. (2008) The Global Dimension of Multilevel Constitutionalism: A Legal Response to the Challenges of Globalisation. Available at: http://www.whi-berlin.eu/documents/whi-paper0908.pdf (accessed: 09.02.2021).

Peters A. (2005) Global Constitutionalism Revisited. International Legal Theory, vol.11, pp.39–66.

Radbrukh G. (2004) Filosofiya prava [Rechtsphilosophie], Yu.M.Yumashev (transl.), Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. (In Russian).

Ross A. (1950) Constitution of the United Nations: Analysis of Structure and Function, New York: Rinehart & Company.

Schwöbel C.E.J. (2011) Global Constitutionalism in International Legal Perspective, Leiden; Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff.

Shmitt K. (2013) Gosudarstvo: Pravo i politika [State: Law and politics], Moscow: Izdatel’skiy dom “Territoriya budushchego”. (In Russian).

Shustrov D. (2018) Material’nye predely izmeneniya konstitutsiy postsovetskikh gosudarstv [Material limits of changing the constitutions of post-soviet states]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.27, no.2, pp.86–103. (In Russian).

Shustrov D.G. (2018) Material’nye predely izmeneniya Konstitutsii Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Material limits of changes to the Constitution of the Russian Federation]. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal’noe pravo, no.7, pp.17–22. (In Russian).

Shustrov D.G. (2019) Raznourovnevaya model’ izmeneniya Konstitutsii RF: mekhanizmy obespeche­niya konstitutsionnoy stabil’nosti [Multilevel model of changing the Constitution of the Russian Federation: mechanisms for ensuring constitutional stability]. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal’noe pravo, no.5, pp.3–15. (In Russian).

Shustrov D.G. (2020) Konstitutsionnaya identichnost’ i izmenenie konstitutsii [Constitutional identity and constitutional change]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta, no.4, pp.21–49. (In Russian).

Sieyès E.-J. (1789) Rassmotrenie i obosnovannoe izlozhenie prav cheloveka i grazhdanina, zachitannoe 20 i 21 iyulya 1789 g. v konstitutsionnom komitete Abbatom Siyesom [Consideration and substantiation of human and citizen rights, read on 20 and 21 july 1789 in the constitutional committee by Abbot Sieyès]. In: Veshnyakov A.A. (ed.) (2003) Politicheskie instituty, izbiratel’noe pravo i protsess v trudakh zapadnoevropeyskikh mysliteley XVII — nachala XX vekov: khrestomatiya [Political institutions, electoral law and process in the works of Western European thinkers of the XVII — early XX centuries: an anthology], Kaluga: Kaluzhskiy fond vozrozhdeniya istoriko-kul’­turnykh i dukhovnykh traditsiy “Simvol”, pp.347–355. (In Russian).

Sieyès E.-J. (1905) Chto takoe tret’e soslovie? [What is the third estate?], V.Ya.Bogucharskiy (transl.), Saint Petersburg: Golos. (In Russian).

Tsagourias N. (ed.) (2007) Transnational Constitutionalism: International and European Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Vedel G. (1993) Souveraineté et supraconstitutionnalité. Pouvoirs: Revue française d’études constitutionnelles et politiques, no.67, pp.79–97.

Verdross A. (1926) Die Verfassung der Völkerrechtsgemeinschaft, Wien: Springer.

Verdross A. (1950) Völkerrecht, 2nd ed., Wien: Springer.

Verdross A., Simma B. (1984) Universelles Völkerrecht: Theorie und Praxis, 3rd ed., Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

Von Bogdandy A. (2008) Konstitutsionalizm v mezhdunarodnom prave: kommentarii k predlozheniyu iz Germanii [Constitutionalism in international law: comments on the proposal from Germany]. Pravo i politika, no.1, pp.50–63. (In Russian).

Von Bogdandy A. (2008) Pluralism, Direct Effect, and the Ultimate Say: on the Relationship Between International and Domestic Constitutional Law. International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol.6, no.3–4, pp.397–413.

Von Bogdandy A., Bast J. (eds.) (2007) Principles of European Constitutional Law, Oxford; Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.

Von Hesse K. (1981) Osnovy konstitutsionnogo prava FRG [Grundzüge des Verfassungsrechts der Bundesrepublik Deutschland], N.A.Sidorov (ed.), E.A.Sidorova (transl.), 11th ed., Moscow: Yuri­dicheskaya literatura. (In Russian).

Walker N. (2002) The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism. Modern Law Review, vol.65, no.3, pp.317–359.

Walker N. (2005) The Migration of Constitutional Ideas and Migration of the Constitutional Idea: The Case of the EU. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=837106 (accessed: 09.02.2021).

Weiler J.H.H., Wind M. (eds.) (2003) European Constitutionalism Beyond the State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wiederin E. (2011) Die Stufenbaulehre Adolf Julius Merkls. In: Griller S., Rill H.-P. (eds.) Rechtstheorie: Rechtsbegriff — Dynamik — Auslegung, Wien; New York: Springer, pp.81–134.

Willoughby W.W. (1924) The Fundamental Concepts of Public Law, New York: The MacMillan Company.

Zor’kin V.D. (2017) Konstitutsionnaya identichnost’ Rossii: doktrina i praktika [Constitutional identity of Russia: doctrine and practice]. Zhurnal konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya, no.4, pp.1–12. (In Russian).

Zumbansen P. (2012) Comparative, Global and Transnational Constitutionalism: The Emergence of a Transnational Legal-Pluralist Order. Global Constitutionalism, vol.1, no.1, pp.16–52.

Issue articles