The full text of the article is available only in Russian.
The question of the value content of the Constitution of the Russian Federation is of fundamental importance for the science of constitutional law. The practice of resolving conflicts arising between various actors and the global prospects for the development of constitutionalism in the future depend on the resolution of this issue. Many constitutional formulas require clarification of their content, but they still have to remain the basis for the clarification that is being made. The proposed response to the article of S.Belov considers the ratio of meanings in the text of the Constitution and the results of its interpretation; descriptive and prescriptive approaches to constitutionalism; object and subject of scientific knowledge. The observer effect known since the formation of the nonclassical paradigm indicates a change in the observed system as a result of the observation itself. Understanding this effect actualizes the problem of cognition of real systems; awareness of distortions introduced by research does not remove, but, on the contrary, sharpens the problem of choosing a research methodology that would allow one to obtain the desired knowledge about an object that existed before distortion. For constitutional law, which has a clearly expressed value component and, accordingly, is associated with the involvement of assessments of the cognizing subject, the problem of choosing arguments, including historical and communicative ones, requires great attention in the light of the danger of adjusting the argument to a given result. This article substantiates the idea, which means that interpretation of the constitution must take into consideration its normative nature, essence, functions, and aims.
About the author:
Alexandra Troitskaya – Candidate of Sciences (Ph.D.) in Law, Associate Professor, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
Citation: Troitskaya A. (2019) Tsennosti rossiyskoy Konstitutsii: effekt nablyudatelya? [Values of the Russian Constitution: the observer effect?]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.28, no.4, pp.84–98. (In Russian).
Aleinikoff T.A. (1987) Constitutional Law in the Age of Balancing. Yale Law Journal, vol.96, no.5, pp.943–1005.
Alexy R. (2002) A Theory of Constitutional Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Avbelj M. (2018) There is No Such Thing As a Particular “Center and Eastern European Constitutionalism”. Verfassungsblog, 18 May. Available at: https://verfassungsblog.de/there-is-no-such-thing-as-a-particular-center-and-eastern-european-constitutionalism/ (accessed: 17.07.2019).
Backer L.C. (2009) The Party as Polity, The Communist Party, and the Chinese Constitutional State: A Theory of State-Party Constitutionalism. Journal of Chinese and Comparative Law, vol.16, no.1, pp.101–168.
Barak A. (2012) Proportionality: Constitutional Rights and their Limitations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bogdanova N.A., Shustrov D.G. (eds.) (2014) Khrestomatiya po konstitutsionnomu pravu [Readings on constitutional law], Saint Petersburg: Izdatel’skiy dom “Alef Press”. (In Russian).
Cotterrell R. (2007) Is It So Bad to Be Different? Comparative Law and the Appreciation of Diversity. In: Örücü E., Nelken D. (eds.) Comparative Law: A Handbook, Oxford; Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, pp.133–154.
Dozhikov A. (2018) Stakan napolovinu polon ili pust? Vmeshatel’stvo kak forma ogranicheniya konstitutsionnykh prav [Is the glass half-empty or half-full? Interference as a form of constitutional rights’ limitation]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.27, no.1, pp.80–112. (In Russian).
Ebzeev B.S. (2013) Chelovek, narod, gosudarstvo v konstitutsionnom stroe Rossiyskoy Federatsii [The man, the people, the state in the constitutional order of the Russian Federation], Moscow: Prospect. (In Russian).
Elster J. (1992) V chem smysl sozdaniya konstitutsii [Making sense of constitution-making]. Konstitutsionnoe pravo: vostochnoevropeyskoe obozrenie, vol.1, no.1, pp.10–12. (In Russian).
Ewald W. (1995) Comparative Jurisprudence (II): The Logic of Legal Transplants. The American Journal of Comparative Law, vol.43, no.4, pp.489–505.
Frentzel-Zagórska J. (ed.) (1993) From a One-Party State to Democracy: Transition in Eastern Europe, Amsterdam; Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.
Gerring J. (2009) The Case Study: What It Is and What It Does. In: Goodin R.E. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.1134–1165.
Glenn H.P. (2014) Legal Traditions of the World, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grimm D. (2007) Proportionality in Canadian and German Constitutional Jurisprudence. University of Toronto Law Journal, vol.57, no.2, pp.383–397.
Gutto Sh. (2003) Constitutionalism, Elections, and Democracy in Africa: Theory and Praxis: Paper presented at the Africa Conference: Elections, Democracy and Governance, 7–10 April, Pretoria. Available at: https://www.scribd.com/document/191487748/Prof-S-Gutto-Constitutionalism-Elections-and-Democracy-in-Africa-Theory-and-Praxis (accessed: 17.07.2019).
Hailbronner M. (2017) Transformative Constitutionalism: Not Only in the Global South. American Journal of Comparative Law, vol.65, no.3, pp.527–565.
Jacobsohn G.J. (2011) The Formation of Constitutional Identities. In: Ginsburg T., Dixon R. (eds.) Comparative Constitutional Law, Cheltenham; Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp.129–142.
Kolyushin E.I., Nelyubin A.A. (eds.) (2007) Rossiya kak sotsial’noe gosudarstvo: konstitutsionnaya model’ i real’nost’ [Russia as a welfare state: constitutional model and reality], Moscow: Izdanie Soveta Federatsii. (In Russian).
Krasnov M.A. (2017) Nekotorye gipotezy o prichinakh vozvrashcheniya Rossii k potestarnomu tipu gosudarstva [Some hypotheses about the reasons for the return of Russia to the potestarnom type of state]. Pravo: istoriya i sovremennost’, no.1, pp.8–17. (In Russian).
Kumm M. (2006) What Do You Have in Virtue of Having a Constitutional Right? On the Place and Limits of the Proportionality Requirement: New York University Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers. Paper 46. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/30505128_What_Do_You_Have_in_Virtue_of_Having_a_Constitutional_Right_On_the_Place_and_Limits_of_the_Proportionality_Requirement (accessed: 17.07.2019).
Levinson S. (2004) Looking Abroad When Interpreting the U.S. Constitution: Some Reflections. Texas International Law Journal, vol.39, no.3, pp.353–366.
Lutz D.S. (2000) Thinking about Constitutionalism at the Start of the Twenty-First Century. Publius, vol.30, no.4, pp.115–135.
Mavronicola N. (2012) What is an “Absolute Right”? Deciphering Absoluteness in the Context of the European Convention of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review, vol.12, no.4, pp.723–758.
Mishin A.A. (2006) Konstitutsionnoe (gosudarstvennoe) pravo zarubezhnykh stran [Constitutional (state) law of foreign countries], Moscow: Yustitsinform. (In Russian).
Möller K. (2012) Proportionality: Challenging the Critics. International Journal of Comparative Law, vol.10, no.3, pp.709–731.
Spektorskiy E.V. (1917) Chto takoe konstitutsiya? [What is a constitution?], Moscow: Tipografiya tovarishchestva Ryabushinskikh. (In Russian).
Sajo A. (1996) Kak verkhovenstvo prava pogubilo reformu sotsial’noy zashchity v Vengrii [How the rule of law killed Hungarian welfare reform]. Konstitutsionnoe pravo: vostochnoevropeyskoe obozrenie, vol.5, no.2, pp.2–11. (In Russian).
Schlink B. (2012) K probleme balansa fundamental’nykh prav i obshchestvennykh tseley [On the problem of the balance of fundamental rights and public goals]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.21, no.2, pp.56–76. (In Russian).
Schontal B. (2018) Stanovlenie i razvitie buddiyskogo konstitutsionalizma v Yuzhnoy i Yugo-Vostochnoy Azii [Formations of buddhist constitutionalism in South and Southeast Asia]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.27, no.4, pp.57–84. (In Russian).
Teitel R. (1994) Post-Communist Constitutionalism: A Transitional Perspective. Columbia Human Rights Law Review, vol.26, no.1, pp.167–190.
Tezcür G. (2007) Constitutionalism, Judiciary, and Democracy in Islamic Societies. Polity, vol.39, no.4, pp.479–501.
Twiss S.B. (2007) Torture, Justification, and Human Rights: Toward an Absolute Proscription. Human Rights Quarterly, vol.29, no.2, pp.346–67.
Vitruk N.V. (2016) Vernost’ Konstitutsii [Fidelity to the Constitution], Moscow: RGUP. (In Russian).
Von Bogdandy A., Mac-Gregor E.F., Antoniazzi M.M., Piovesan F., Soley X. (eds.) (2017) Transformative Constitutionalism in Latin America: The Emergence of a New Ius Commune, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Webber G.C.N. (2012) The Negotiable Constitution: On the Limitation of Rights, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moscow, Shchepkina str., 8
+7 (495) 608-69-59
+7 (495) 608-66-35